I am not really a proponent of democracy. One of the reasons I joined the Extinction Rebellion movement in the first place is because I don’t really believe in democracy: I believe in smart people making decisions, for the benefit of both smart people and dumb people (like low IQ low status white males). If I believed in democracy, I would just sit on the sidelines and do nothing, watching passively as Dutch low IQ low status white males vote to make our planet uninhabitable.
When it comes to problems like climate change, dumb people just should not be allowed to have a say in the matter. Dumb people can argue with each other over whether gays should be allowed to marry, whether transgenders should use the male or the female bathroom, whether your local Walmart should have a sign that says “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Holidays” etc. I am very much in favor of dumb people arguing with each other over such questions.
Some problems however, are just too complex and important for dumb people to have a say in the matter. Climate change is an example. It is very difficult for low IQ low status white males to accept that this is a real problem. That’s not an argument against climate change being a problem. It’s an argument against low IQ low status white males having a say in the matter. The comments on my blog are a lasting testimony to the fact that low IQ low status white males should not have a say in the matter.
Trying to explain to low IQ low status white males why we need to stop burning fossil fuels, is like having a credit card debt you’re struggling to pay off and trying to explain to your son why you can’t go to Disney World. It’s embarrassing that you ever let the problem get to this point, but the innocent naive child was mistakenly led to believe as a result that a normal situation (you spending money you don’t have) is sustainable.
Similarly, our use of the atmosphere as a waste dump for our pollution for over a century, led low IQ low status white males to believe this is a normal sustainable situation. It’s not. They’re like innocent naive children, who grew used to an abnormal situation, that was caused by the irresponsibility of their parents.
The parents wanted to make their children happy, so they took them to Six Flags, they bought them a new Playstation, all with money they did not have. Similarly, our elected government officials wanted to make their low IQ low status white males happy, so they gave them things we could not afford: SUVs, vacations on the Bahamas, hamburgers from cows fed soybeans grown from the amazon forest, houses in the suburbs, etcetera.
You, the low IQ low status white males, are now like bratty children, really angry that your dad who is struggling to pay both his mortgage and his credit card, has now told you that unfortunately he can’t take you to Disney World this summer: “WHAT DO YOU MEAN WE’RE NOT GOING TO DISNEY WORLD! THIS IS GLOBALIST TYRANNY! I HATE YOU DAD! I WON’T EAT THE BUGS AND LIVE IN A POD!”
The real problem is that your dad never properly explained to you the problem he is dealing with. In addition to that, you grew entitled. So now that your dad realizes his credit card is almost maxed out and he will need to buy groceries this week, he decided that the family can’t go to Disney World, even if that means you think he is actually a satan-worshipping pedophile who wants to kill his kids.
You’re a child, so you don’t understand what happens to your dad when he maxes out his credit card and can’t pay off his debt. That’s what I notice with most of the low IQ low status white males who are so angry right now: They just don’t understand what happens when we change the climate. All they see is that their dad is suddenly admitting he’s not taking them to Disney World after avoiding the topic for weeks.
When I see low IQ low status white males argue that temperatures used to be higher millions years ago, or that the polar bears are fine, I’m just seeing people who don’t understand the nature of the problem. Just as a child has never had to deal with the consequences of debt, with people showing up to your door to take away your possessions and kick you out of your house, low IQ low status white males have never had to deal with the consequences of wet bulb temperatures above 35 degree Celsius.
Every once in a while, I see a low IQ low status white male bring up the polar bears. That’s the funny thing. I never hear climate change activists talk about the polar bears. I never hear Greta Thunberg talk about the polar bears. Whenever low IQ low status white males bring up the polar bears, it’s just a glaring indicator that they don’t understand the nature of the problem.
The nature of the problem is that you die within hours, even in the shade, at wet bulb temperatures above 35 degree Celsius. That matters, because parts of the world home to billions of people will occasionally reach such temperatures by 2100 if we fail to stop burning fossil fuels. It means all the wild above-ground mammals there die, along with humans if you get a power outage. It would most likely result in billions of deaths.
I think that’s part of the problem we’re dealing with. This was never explained to people like this. What you heard in the media back in the early 00’s is that the polar bears were going hungry, so low IQ low status white males now think that’s the problem, rather than billions of deaths by the end of this century and societal collapse.
The media doesn’t tell you the real problem, because they don’t want to make people depressed and alienate them. Nobody wants to come home in the evening after a day at the office, turn on his TV and hear that his way of life is unsustainable and will lead to billions of deaths. So what you got instead is: “Hey try taking shorter showers so the polar bears don’t go hungry.”
I mean, growing up as a young LSWM I could see my parents yell at the TV whenever the topic was brought up anyway. Now imagine if people back then were told the reality: Your kids will die because of this, if you don’t solve it. They would get really angry, as they already have enough misery to worry about.
In fact, you can look at how the Dutch TV channels get good ratings. They get good ratings by inviting this moron on the show. This is the leader of the Dutch farmer’s party. She has no understanding of anything. She says in an interview in Belgium that Belgium doesn’t have a nitrogen problem, only to be corrected by the guy interviewing her that it does. I wouldn’t care, but her one issue is to support the farmers who are causing the pollution, so you would expect to see some basic knowledge on that issue. There is none.
If Dutch TV channels want to get good ratings and get a lot of boomers watching, they have to invite this woman. If they want to chase all the boomers away, they have to bring up climate change. The people demanding of the weatherman to point it out to the boomers when we suffer climate change induced freak weather, are the sort of intelligent young people who don’t watch TV anyway. Your local weatherman just gets death threats from boomers when he does.
But the result of this dynamic, is that low IQ low status white males and boomers now think we have to transform the global economy so that the polar bears don’t go hungry, because the media has to walk on egg shells around this topic, to avoid angering them. They are shielded from reality and demand that nobody removes that shield.
I’m not going to link to any of these climate change denial essays, but I pointed out here why the sort of people who deny the problem, just do not understand how fragile our way of life is, how much it depends on our current climatic conditions.
Whenever the low IQ low status white males bring up that temperatures used to be much higher millions of years ago, they just illustrate that they have basically no real understanding of how our civilization functions. Just because temperatures back then were higher, does not mean our civilization could cope with those conditions.
It means you don’t understand how we depend on cold winters, to avoid tropical parasites showing up in our soils that will reduce your kids IQ. It means you don’t understand how our crops, the handful of grain species we use that evolved in response to low atmospheric CO2, can not compete at high CO2 concentrations with invasive weeds.
It means you don’t understand how fungal pathogens thrive on our crops under high CO2 concentrations. It means you don’t understand how agriculture depends on stable precipitation patterns and can not survive under rising hourly precipitation extremes that will trigger soil erosion in places not covered by mature trees. It means you don’t understand how we depend on stable jet streams, to maintain predictable weather patterns.
It means you don’t understand how oceanic dead zones can lead to massive emissions of hydrogen sulfide that will just kill people living near the coast. It means you don’t understand how sudden bursts of methane can lead to depletion of the hydroxyl radical.
It means you don’t understand how we depend on stable temperatures to avoid releasing frozen methane in bursts that can cause underwater landslides that trigger tsunamis. You see evidence of far more megatsunamis in the geological record during periods of sea level change.
Of course I’m not even mentioning the biggest problem: It’s mostly the speed of the change that fucks everything up. It’s the speed of the change, that causes you to lose fertile soils in one place, long before they have regrown in another place. It’s the speed of the change, that triggers massive forest fires, big enough to generate their own weather systems. It’s the speed of the change, that causes mass extinction.
It’s the speed of the change, that forces animal species to migrate. When they migrate, they come into contact with other species they would normally never meet. When that happens, they pass viruses over to each other. Do you want to find out what happens when African Ebola viruses suddenly show up in European bats that have no immunity to them?
But when low IQ low status white males need to have all of this explained to them, all they’re proving is that they’re like children. When little Billy demonstrates to dad that the tank is full of gas so they can drive to Disney World, he’s not proving that dad’s credit card debt is a hoax. Rather, little Billy is just demonstrating to mom and dad that he lives in naive innocence about the world.
That doesn’t mean the family can suddenly afford to go to Disney World. It means that mom and dad did a good job at shielding them from the harsh reality of life, but a poor job at preparing them for the reality of adulthood.
In other words, a bit like what our media did to the boomers. Incidentally that’s also what low IQ low status white males did to themselves, by browsing Infowars, ZeroHedge and other blogs for low IQ low status white males, until they found that one article that told them what they want to hear.
You can choose to stay like children. It’s clearly what most of you want. But when you bring up that your stupid dad is not taking you to Disney World, I’m not going to lie to your face. I will tell you that your dad was being irresponsible and ran himself into debt. That’s why you can’t go to Disney World.