Accelerate The World; Decelerate Your Tribe

I tend to have some sympathy for the militant accelerationists, who argue that our present day society is so disgusting and corrupt that it should be destroyed. I am however less positive about the white supremacist and antisemitic angles, for reasons I will also elaborate on.

For starters, white Europeans have only been around for less than 10,000 years. White skin didn’t really grow dominant in Europe until 3000-1700 years ago. We evolved pretty recently, our Homo Sapiens ancestors were all darker skinned. We seem to have evolved mainly due to sexual selection. Men in every culture tend to prefer women with less dark skin than them. Elite men of the ruling class tend to hoard pale women for themselves.

Blonde hair and blue eyes also spontaneously emerge sometimes through mutations in other parts of the world. If the correct environmental conditions are there for white skin to emerge, it will emerge. White skin also emerged independently in East Asian populations, long before Europeans developed white skin. Materialists don’t have an answer as to why these mutations emerge, other than “meaningless randomness”.

If all white people disappeared tomorrow, but we returned to the climate of the early Holocene, white people would simply re-emerge spontaneously through genetic mutations within a few thousand years. Far more worrisome is the fact that animals like elephants and gorillas are threatened with extinction. Unlike white people, if they were to go extinct, they won’t come into existence again during this planet’s future.

It also doesn’t take long for white skin to sweep through a population, because it is so highly desired. Most non-white men also enjoy watching their wives have sex with white men. When you truly love a woman you want her to be happy and all the statistics show women of every background have a preference for white men.

There are of course issues affecting white people that are real problems, but the idea that the white supremacists have, that other races, particularly Jews, actively seek to destroy white people, is unrealistic. Mostly, they just desire access to white people. Part of the problem is that far-right white men tend to suffer autism. They take the message offered by society (which is basically the supremacy of fat black women) literally, instead of recognizing people’s revealed preferences.

Until the United States imposed decolonization on the European powers, access to white people was relatively easy. Every developing region in the world had its own local population of white people. In places like Senegal, as a white man you will still be shouted at by locals as “toubab”, which seems to be derived from the Arab word for doctor, tabib.

Every colonized region had a steady supply of white people, who took care of the most urgent problems affecting the society. They abolished slavery, bride-burning, female genital mutilation and other social ills. In addition, they had offspring with local women, creating a mixed-heritage population that served as the middle class. In parts of Southern Africa, when a white man visits a village he is still commonly offered a woman for the night and they feel hurt when you reject the offer.

The white nationalist types see their own nations being destroyed by mass migration from non-Western countries and think to themselves that we should have racial separation, but I don’t think this really benefits anyone. Rather, the late 19th century represents a kind of peak in societal development. Western countries colonized non-Western places and eliminated problems like slavery, while the emigrant European men had children with local women and thereby gave birth to a mixed-race middle class. Everyone benefited.

I also don’t like the antisemitic angle. For starters, the reason Jews have so much power in society is mostly because they are just genuinely intelligent. If you think Jews conspire against white people to gain power, you have to explain to me why a third of all chess grandmasters are Jewish and a quarter of all Nobel prize winners.

Second, the Holocaust really happened. This has been well documented. There were millions of Jews in Poland, then after the war there were practically none. Rudolf Höss, the commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp, never tried to deny what went on in Auschwitz. If you think the Holocaust didn’t happen, you should just read his own words.

Third, the arguments given against the Jews are almost all shoddy. Let me give an example. Hitler’s mentor was Dietrich Eckart, who was acknowledged as the spiritual co-founder of Nazism. Dietrich Eckart promised 1,000 Marks to anyone who could cite one Jewish family whose sons had served longer than three weeks at the front during the First World War.

The Hannover rabbi Samuel Freund then named 20 Jewish families who met this condition and sued Eckart when he refused to pay the reward. During the trial, Freund named 50 more Jewish families with up to seven veterans, among whom were several which lost up to three sons in the war. Eckart lost the case and had to pay.

Fourth, I have to emphasize this, there was once a far right that did not bother with antisemitism, until the German National Socialists shoved it down everyone’s throats. The Japanese had no interest in antisemitism. The Italians had no interest in it. The Dutch NSB had Jewish members. This idea that Jews are responsible for everything bad that ever happened is a far right dogma inherited from Christianity that needs to die.

There’s a growing desire for young boys of non-white and mixed-race descent, to be part of a far-right occult ecofascist movement, but these young boys are receiving no real guidance from anyone. Consider the tragedy of Solomon Henderson as an example, a young black boy convinced of white supremacy, who thought the best way to end his life is to shoot a Hispanic girl in his school before killing himself.

These are boys who look for guidance, for a sense of belonging to a greater community. Mainstream society has of course nothing to offer to them, but the far right doesn’t really have an answer for them either other than mockery, so they try to “prove” themselves by killing as many people as possible.

In a better world, Solomon would have grown up to be a colonial overseer in a West African village. And of course, growing up he would have had a white woman whose feet he’d have to rub under the threat of the whip, ideally Samantha, but I don’t control this reality.

As a leftist, you might say that “no, Solomon Henderson was a self-hating black boy who was brainwashed by the alt-right”, but that leaves me with the question: Can you love Solomon Henderson? I can love Solomon. As a leftist, there isn’t really anything substantial about Solomon you can love, because his whole personality was drenched in the esoteric online right. Strip that away and there is no Solomon, there is just a random black boy with a blank personality. Everything that Solomon would have seen as defining who he is, is something that repulses you, so you can per definition not harbor authentic love for him.

I don’t believe that everyone should be forced to submit to white people, there are groups of people like the Aka pygmies in Africa who are seemingly better off living in isolation, but I think most people naturally harbor this desire and should have the opportunity to indulge in it. White people in turn, harbor the natural desire to learn the dictates of nature and to submit before them. There is a sexual undertone to submission, but what people seem to fail to recognize is that in a healthy society, every aspect of life is saturated with sexual symbolism, just as sex itself becomes saturated with every existing social power dynamic.

You’re not just a physical body, because you can experience raw qualia. You were born with a physical body. Just like they have no answer to the hard problem of consciousness, materialists have no answer to the question why you inhabit the particular body you inhabit, they want you to skip over this question altogether. The idealist answer is that the body you were born into is the body that is most appropriate for you in the current stage of your soul’s evolution. If you were born white, it was appropriate for your soul to be born into a white body in this stage of your evolution. If you were born black, it was appropriate for your soul to be born into a black body in this stage of your soul’s evolution.

For young boys like Henderson, there is essentially nobody who is trying to offer him a meaningful answer as to why he was born black, a visibly recognizable minority for his entire life. In a traditional society like ancient India, he would have received an answer: This is now the appropriate stage for your soul. I don’t know why it is appropriate for you, I don’t think it has to mean you did something wrong. A proper esoteric far right movement would try to offer you spiritual guidance to help you discover why you were born black in a majority white country.

@legoy1488 Accelerate to the nearest McDonald's #larp #acceleration #thefirerises #meme ♬ оригинальный звук – .💤

What we have today on the militant esoteric right just isn’t good enough. And still, I see reason for optimism. To start with, the aesthetics are mostly correct. Beauty, goodness and truth will all lead you in the same direction. What they get right is that this society we live in deserves to be annihilated. It is irreversibly corrupted, it can not be salvaged. Let me give you an example of what I mean:

This is disgusting, it is secular materialism taken to its natural conclusion. Children are supposed to be a product of the passions. Today children are turning into a product designed in a laboratory, at an age when we feel it is appropriate to reproduce. A society that turns human beings into manufactured commodities like this deserves to die.

The environmental problems also speak for themselves. This world was never meant to have eight billion people. Renewable energy simply kicks the can down the hall, it offers no true sustainable solution. The ocean is still being emptied of fish, fertile soils are still flushing down the ocean, aquifers are still being emptied and the Earth is still being ravaged.

What I hate about the “far right” political parties is that they obviously have no real solution to the societal problems we currently face. Take a look at what far right parties like the Dutch Forum for Democracy promise. They promise an end to asylum seekers and “remigration”. That solves perhaps 10% of the problems we face.

What are you going to do about the fact that our world has grown ugly, that we live in crowded overpopulated cities, that almost all wealth and power is now in the hands of insane Silicon Valley billionaires who effectively want to imprison us in virtual reality, that life simply has no meaning anymore, that everything has been done before, that people are stuck in existentially miserable jobs, that 25% of the adult population is on antidepressants, that we have warehouses full of dementing elderly with nobody to take care of them or offer them any dignity? They have no answer, because there is no palatable political solution.

Our world today is so ugly that it deserves to die in a baptism of fire. This is the project to work on. We should embrace a kind of collective annihilation. The school shooters tend to recognize this to some degree. Adam Lanza was unique in being an active efilist, most others tend to loosely adhere to a kind of nihilist or neonazi ideology. Solomon Henderson in particular wrote in the “Niggercell manifesto“:

We’re gonna burn this entire world to the ground and rebuild from the beginning.

The underlying passion for destruction is correct, but the targets tend to be poorly chosen.