Don’t take the vaccine, it’s already starting to fail


Today we’re going to discuss why you should avoid getting the vaccine. I know, they’re not going to allow you to do anything, they will treat you like a second class citizen if you won’t get it, but that’s a price I’m willing to pay and if you read along I’ll explain to you why.

So, there are two types of vaccines out there being used in the West. There’s the mRNA vaccine most people receive, which is encapsuled in lipid nanoparticles. Then there’s the adenovirus vector based vaccine, where you’re injected with a genetically manipulated chimpanzee virus, altered to express the Spike protein.

I want to focus today on the mRNA vaccines. Here’s a question you’re supposed to ask yourself before you sign up for an experimental treatment like this: Where do these lipid nanoparticles end up? They’re designed to be absorbed by cells, but where does this happen exactly? That seems like the kind of basic elementary knowledge we should have before we deliver this vaccine to people, don’t you think?

If you decide to change people’s cells, to express an alien protein, you want to know which cells you’re changing, right? Well, we don’t have this knowledge. It wasn’t researched. If they come to your door, telling you to get injected, ask them where these particles end up and which cells they end up changing. They can’t tell you, because it hasn’t been researched.

But we can make an educated guess. When you inject something into the bloodstream, it will generally be absorbed by cells when it reaches a place where the blood slows down. This will be in your capillary network, the tiniest blood vessels in your body. You have a lot of these blood vessels in your lungs, where they are supposed to absorb oxygen.

So, we take these tiny cells and we make them express an an alien protein. What’s going to happen? Well, the first thing you need to know is that the spike protein itself is toxic. It’s toxic to our cardiovascular system. And so what we are doing now, is that we are exposing the tiniest blood vessels in our body, to an experimental therapy that causes the endothelial cells that line these blood vessels to express a toxic protein.

When it comes to the virus itself, we already know it’s not very dangerous to most healthy young people. We saw two hospitalizations out of 48,000 infected college students. If you’re young, don’t have relevant pre-existing conditions and make sure that you’re not vitamin D deficient, then I don’t expect you’ll be one of the unlucky two.

The mucous membranes that line your upper respiratory tract are your first line of defense. When you inhale a virus, this is where it’s going to end up. A lot of people have evidence of antibodies in mucus, but not in blood, because the virus never manages to gain a foothold in their bloodstream. Most young people who are exposed to this virus won’t end up with massive amounts of spike protein particles in the tiniest blood vessels in their lungs.

So what happens, when we expose the capillary network in the lungs to this protein? Well to start with, we start to see blood clotting issues. You’ve heard about the massive blood clots that cause people to die within days of receiving the vaccines, but you’re told that the pill causes blood clots too and it’s a tiny risk so you should ignore it. However, what nobody ever bothers asking is: For all the blood clots that we detect, how many go undetected?

And that’s the genuinely worrisome part. Based on what we know, we have reason to believe that the detected blood clots, the ones that people generally die from within weeks, are the tip of the iceberg, with many more people suffering numerous tiny blood clots and inflammation throughout their capillary network. These networks generally don’t properly heal when this happens. You damaged a part of your lungs, to virtue signal on Facebook.

So how can you tell that this happens? Well, when the lungs are damaged, your heart needs to perform more work to get enough oxygen-rich blood pumped throughout your body. Because of this, you’ll notice an increased heart rate, known as tachycardia. What do we see in the vaccinated people? We see healthy young people, who suddenly present with tachycardia within days of receiving the vaccine and the condition doesn’t resolve in many. Many also suffer shortness of breath and can’t exercise.

What these people don’t seem to realize however is that they damaged the microscopic blood vessels in their lungs and now they are dealing with the consequences. How long is this going to last? Again, it hasn’t been properly studied. The problem with blood clots is that the hypoxia causes inflammation itself, leading to the risk of a vicious cycle, where the inflammation ends up causing further damage. The young stand a better chance of repairing the damage than the elderly, but only time can tell how severe this problem is going to be.

The nice thing about most other vaccines is that they have been used for decades and so we have a degree of knowledge about any potential long-term health effects. With the new vaccines against COVID-19, we don’t have this track record. It’s perfectly possible that we’re causing long-term lung damage in healthy young people, most of whom won’t notice it straight away, but will suffer the consequences when they are old themselves and their lung function is already in decline. Again, we don’t know because we haven’t studied this properly.

Here’s what we do know. If you’re young, your risk of dying from a blood clot from the vaccine exceeds your risk of dying from COVID-19. For those of you who are both young and health, your risk of dying from a blood clot from the vaccine greatly exceeds your risk of dying from COVID-19. How about long-covid? Well, you can suffer long term symptoms from the vaccine too. A lot of people are reporting symptoms from the vaccine that are identical to those reported by long covid patients. And, in contrast to the vaccine, you may have already had the virus and developed natural immunity.

But there’s the most important part: The whole reason we vaccinate young people against COVID-19 is because we think this will help us develop herd immunity. If we look at the facts on the ground however, we can easily see that it’s just not working:

Here you can see hospital admissions in Scotland. They’re now at half their previous peak, in the middle of summer! As you can see, last summer they had no surge in hospital admissions, but now they do. How has the vaccine helped them end the crisis exactly? It’s clear that the vaccine is failing.

Here you can see vaccination rates in Scotland by age:

You’re not going to do much better than this. And yet, they’re already seeing a surge in hospitalizations, in the middle of summer! Here you can see ICU occupancy in Scotland, the people who are really sick and likely to die:

You can see for yourself that they’re having a massive surge, approaching the surge they had last winter. Again, the young don’t end up in the ICU, almost all the elderly in Scotland have had two shots by now, so why is this happening? If this is how bad it’s getting right now, in the middle of summer, what do you think is going to happen this fall?

You can also look at people in England on mechanical ventilators. Again, it’s looking bad:

Does this look like a virus on the retreat to you?

Here’s my big worry: I think what we’re facing is a situation where the virus is going to further mutate in the months ahead, which subsequently leads to a situation in which people who were vaccinated no longer have a proper immune response that they can launch against the new variants. This is the logical conclusion to draw, if you extrapolate from the evidence we have so far.

We know that most previous attempts at creating vaccines against coronaviruses have failed. Upon being exposed to the virus, the animals developed antibody dependent enhancement and subsequently died. Here’s something that’s guaranteed to make you shit bricks:

Virus vaccines can use live-attenuated virus strains, inactivated (killed) virus, protein subunit, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) vaccine. Antibodies induced by vaccines can be neutralizing or non-neutralizing. Non-neutralizing antibodies can contribute to anti-viral activities with mechanisms including antibody-medicated complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) [reviewed (73)]. The yearly influenza vaccine induces both neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies that provide projection against the strains in the vaccine and closely related strains. Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) can result when there are multiple circularizing serotypes of virus [e.g., Dengue fever (55–57)] or when the virus uses antibodies for expanded host cell trophism of phagocytic immune cells.

Many of the viruses associated with ADE have cell membrane fusion mechanisms (38). For influenza A H1N1, vaccine-induced cross-reactive anti-HA2 antibodies in a swine model promote virus fusion causing vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) (74). ADE was observed for the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in the Bonnet monkey model (37). Van Erp et al. (37) recommends avoidance of induction of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) non-neutralizing antibodies or subneutralizing antibodies to avoid ADE. ADE has been observed in multiple SARS-CoV-1 animal models. In a mouse model, attempts to create vaccines for SARS-CoV-1 lead to pulmonary immunopathology upon challenge with SARS-CoV-1 (75, 76); these vaccines included inactivated whole viruses, inactivated viruses with adjuvant, and a recombinant DNA spike (S) protein vaccine in a virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine. Severe pneumonia was observed in mice vaccinated with nucleocapsid protein after challenge with SARS-CoV-1 (77). Enhanced hepatitis was observed in a ferret model with a vaccine with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) expressing the SARS-CoV-1 Spike protein (78). ADE was observed for rhesus macaques with SARS-CoV-1 vaccine (79). SARS-CoV-1 ADE is mediated by spike protein antibodies (80). Antibodies to the SARS-CoV-1 spike protein can mediate viral entry via Fc receptor-expressing cells in a dose-dependent manner (54). Jaume et al. (34) point out the potential pitfalls associated with immunizations against SARS-CoV-1 Spike protein due to Fc mediate infection of immune cells. This leads to the prediction that new attempts to create either SARS-CoV-1 vaccines, MERS-CoV vaccines (81), or SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have potentially higher risks for inducing ADE in humans facilitated by antibody infection of phagocytic immune cells. This potential ADE risk is independent of the vaccine technology (82) or targeting strategy selected due to predicted phagocytic immune cell infections upon antibody uptake. For MERS patients, the seroconversion rate increased with disease severity (83). Severe clinical worsening for SARS patients occurs concurrently with timing of IgG seroconversion (84). Clinical evidence of early high IgG responses in SARS patients is correlated with disease progression (85) and severity (62–67). Antibody treatments for critically ill COVID-19 patients have been halted due to a potential safety signal and unfavorable risk-benefit profile (86). Current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines appear to be providing protection with high antibody titers; the possibility of ADE risks associated with waning titers of antibodies over time remains unknown.

Remember this line:

Van Erp et al. (37) recommends avoidance of induction of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) non-neutralizing antibodies or subneutralizing antibodies to avoid ADE.

Because this is going to be important. Take a look at this study:

In this study we profiled vaccine-induced polyclonal antibodies as well as plasmablast derived mAbs from individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine. Polyclonal antibody responses in vaccinees were robust and comparable to or exceeded those seen after natural infection. However, the ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination was greater than that after natural infection and, at the monoclonal level, we found that the majority of vaccine-induced antibodies did not have neutralizing activity. We also found a co-dominance of mAbs targeting the NTD and RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike and an original antigenic-sin like backboost to seasonal human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1. Neutralizing activity of NTD mAbs but not RBD mAbs against a clinical viral isolate carrying E484K as well as extensive changes in the NTD was abolished, suggesting that a proportion of vaccine induced RBD binding antibodies may provide substantial protection against viral variants carrying single E484K RBD mutations.

Your body generates a higher ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination, than after natural infection. In other words, there is far more potential for antibody dependent enhancement after vaccination, than after recovering from a natural infection. The way they solved this problem, is by simply injecting you with high doses, multiple times. This way you might have a lot of non-neutralizing antibodies, but you also have a lot of neutralizing antibodies, so the vaccine still works to prevent you from getting severe disease.

But here’s the thing: This probably doesn’t last, as the antibody response declines over time and your body is going to be faced with new variants. So what’s going to happen? Well, after you got your first shot, chances are they’re going to get you hooked to constant boosters, because without the boosters you would be worse off than if you had never been vaccinated to begin with. And as we discussed earlier, with every single booster you’re spraying numerous copies of a toxic protein into your tiniest blood vessels.

Do you think this stops after two shots? They’re preparing to roll out the third shot in Israel as we speak. And it’s only July. We know that this virus mainly spreads during fall and winter in most developed countries. That’s when it infects the most people, has the most ability to generate new variants and causes the most illness. The fact that we’re already seeing a surge in July, despite vaccinating all the elderly just a few weeks ago, should have us very worried about what we will be seeing this fall.

My expectation is simple: It’s going to get ugly. I don’t know how ugly, but let’s just summarize the facts that we already have:

-If you’re under forty, your risk of dying from a blood clot induced by the vaccines exceeds your risk of dying from COVID-19.

-The vaccines inject your body with genetic material that instructs your cells to produce trillions of copies of a protein that we know is toxic to your blood vessels.

-When our immune system produces non-neutralizing antibodies against a coronavirus, the risk exists that these antibodies actually lead to worse disease.

-People who have been vaccinated show a higher ratio of non-neutralizing antibodies to neutralizing antibodies. The vaccine manufacturers try to mask this, by inducing an artificially strong immune response. If you look into the study, you’ll find that the ratio also seems to grow worse as time passes among the vaccinated people.

If it looked like the vaccine genuinely protects against the risk of being hospitalized or worse from this virus, I would have said: “Take the vaccine if you’re old, or suffer from pre-existing health conditions.” That’s what I thought about three months ago, but I follow where the evidence leads me. When we look at what has happened since then, I don’t see anything that would suggest to me that this vaccine is going to protect at-risk people during the winter. Keep this in mind: If we’re already seeing the vaccine fail during the summer, what should we expect to see happening this winter?

My advice is thus very simple:

Do not take the vaccine.

It doesn’t matter if they’re going to turn you into a second class citizen who is not allowed to participate in society. It’s your body and thus your choice. You have perfectly fine options available for yourself to protect your body without depending on experimental interventions. You can take vitamin D3, zinc, magnesium and vitamin B12. You can rinse your nasal cavity with salt water.

It might sound like primitive folk superstition, but chewing raw garlic when you notice the first symptoms works too: The allicin and other compounds found in fresh garlic have an antiviral effect when you end up inhaling them into your respiratory tract. A lot of working class (ie non-woke) Muslims in the Netherlands do this, people in the Middle East are well aware of the antiviral benefits of garlic.

I expect that this winter is going to get pretty ugly, even for the non-vaccinated. Again, if we look at Scotland, we’re already seeing hospital admissions at a level that approaches the level normally seen during winter. We’ve done something very stupid: We tried to get rid of a respiratory virus, by abolishing social interaction. This is an unprecedented experiment that was invented by a communist dictator, an experiment that’s almost guaranteed to blow up in our faces.

Now we think that we’ve beaten the respiratory virus and gradually return to normal social interaction. The respiratory viruses will now have to find a new equilibrium with their human hosts, which is unfortunately not a simple and smooth process. You can already see the epidemic of children who end up in the hospital because of simple respiratory viruses that normally circulate but disappeared due to the lockdowns and the masks.

Conservatives are stupid, because they think they can have their cake and eat it too: They want society to function, but they also don’t want to get accused of killing old people. The solution they thought they had found to that was the Deus ex Machina of the COVID-19 vaccine. Simply give everyone a shot and now this virus has no other choice than to disappear, allowing us to return to normal. Technology saved the day.

Unfortunately, that’s just not how the world works. If the Chinese government exports a new respiratory virus to all four corners of the world, then we will have to carry the consequences. There is no real other way around it. They ended up spreading a new virus, a highly contagious virus that can linger in some people’s bodies for months, can infect you without ever showing up on PCR tests and even spreads through other mammals. Zero COVID is a delusion, this novel virus was already everywhere, before we even had a name for it. An imperfect vaccine deployed in the middle of a pandemic can be worse than no vaccine. We’re about to find out the consequences.


  1. “Conservatives are stupid, because they think they can have their cake and eat it too”
    Thats what Ted Kaczynsky said didn’t he, but he was talking about something else, maybe eliminating nepotism but keeping strong family values.

    It depends on the country, some will be denied access to work and thus food and shelter if they don’t get vaccinated. Then they’ll really be up the creek without a paddle.

    • Yeah I’m lucky because I can just survive off my savings for a while. If they won’t let me go to the supermarket I could just order food to my house.

      If your job requires you to have mRNA injected into your bloodstream then I would honestly just recommend finding another job, but I understand other people have their own calculations to make.

  2. > When our immune system produces non-neutralizing antibodies against a coronavirus, the risk exists that these antibodies actually lead to worse disease.

    I think the crux is what the risk of ADE entails. I’m already vaccinated (with Pfizer), so I’m already on this ride, wherever it may lead to.

    A few thoughts:

    * Scotland was mostly vaccinated with non-MRNA vaccines (the AZ), it could simply be less effective. The “surge” in Israel is tiny in comparison.
    * In the case that Vanden Bossche is proven right and we breed a super variant, as I understand it, the most likely outcome in that scenario is those without antibodies (unvaccinated or natural immunity) would get wiped out (including refuseniks as well as children and those with weak immune systems like the elderly).
    * The spike protein’s toxicity is well known by now, but how do the virus and the vaccine’s version differ, and what’s the danger profile of the vaccines versions compared to being attacked by the live virus’ version.

    In any case, I agree with you that I’m not very hopeful for this Fall/Winter, I expect lockdowns in Europe and Blue States. Although lockdowns seem trivial compared to the doomsday scenarios. It really would be the ultimate irony if mankind ends up creating a cure even worse than the disease, but so far, that seems to have been our entire track record this pandemic. Maybe that’s why there is so much faith and optimism on the vaccines (including mine).

    It’s like we can’t bear the psychological hit, if not only is God dead, but so is Science, then what will come to save us?

    • >Scotland was mostly vaccinated with non-MRNA vaccines (the AZ), it could simply be less effective. The “surge” in Israel is tiny in comparison.

      Well yeah there’s the thing. I tell people “look at Chile” and they tell me “Chinese vaccines don’t work”. I tell people “look at Scotland” and I’m told “AstraZeneca doesn’t work.”

      What I would say instead is: Israel is just lagging behind the UK.

      >* In the case that Vanden Bossche is proven right and we breed a super variant, as I understand it, the most likely outcome in that scenario is those without antibodies (unvaccinated or natural immunity) would get wiped out (including refuseniks as well as children and those with weak immune systems like the elderly).

      Nah, that’s not what Vanden Bossche is predicting. He’s saying that first the unvaccinated will get hit (which is currently happening), but then eventually it moves to the vaccinated population and they end up suffering mass death, particularly the ones who have not had a natural infection before getting vaccinated.

      >but how do the virus and the vaccine’s version differ, and what’s the danger profile of the vaccines versions compared to being attacked by the live virus’ version.

      I think the difference mostly comes down to: Where does the spike protein end up?

      If you’re dealing with a natural infection, I think it mostly ends up in our mucous membranes.

      If you’re dealing with the vaccine, it mostly ends up in your capillary blood vessels.

  3. This fall will be bad, but they are just going to blame it on the unvaccinated. Once the mob finds someone to blame for an outbreak, usually riots and lynchings follow, and authorities are all too happy to defuse responsibility onto someone else’s shoulders, so good luck (to us).

    Given your varied interests, you might find the story of the Column of Infamy (; of interest. I use it as a reference.

    What is your opinion about non-mRNA vaccines, like the Sanofi one? I’d much rather take a vaccine based on a technology that is better tested and understood.

    • >What is your opinion about non-mRNA vaccines, like the Sanofi one? I’d much rather take a vaccine based on a technology that is better tested and understood.

      No strong opinions, but the inactivated vaccines don’t seem to work either, if we look at Chile.

      • I am not really concerned about the effectiveness of vaccines: I am healthy and under 40, my immune system will take care of the virus, and it probably already has.

        Rather, I think that vaccines are a way to signal subservience to the ongoing power shift.

        I have a career and a family that I want to protect, so I am willing to signal subservience. However, I would rather take a vaccine that does not hurt my health in the process.

        (All adults in German-occupied Northern Italy were requested to pledge obedience to the puppet regime. Most did. In hindsight, I am quite jealous that they only had to compromise their conscience, and not their inner organs).

    • “Moral panic” it said in wikipedia re. that film. IMO plenty of people are already acting a bit like that with those that don’t fancy the vaccine. TV watchers especially have been scared for 18 months now and they want a simple situation, including maybe scapegoats, yes.

  4. Radagast, can I stay at yours in Holland for free for a bit if my situation goes tits up, which it will? I can tell you what I have seen unfolding in France these past 18 months, however I imagine it’s pretty similar to what unfolded in Holland.

  5. I have no telephone, I don’t think I can use telegram. Zoom and skype don’t work on my ancient computer. I use facebook messenger to talk to foreigners. Everyone hates facebook, I know, but that’s just what I use. If you have any other ideas you can email me on the email address that I always have to type in when I comment.

  6. For the record, I would like to point out the following passage from the article reporting Pfizer and moderna causing the same frequency of clots as AstraZeneca:

    The risk of getting CVT is much higher for those who get COVID-19 — 39 in a million patients — than it is for those who get vaccinated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.