“[My country] is responsible for [Small percentage] of CO2 emissions. Why should we destroy our economy, when India and China are building a trillion new coal plants? We can’t solve the problem on our own!”
-A low IQ low status white male in a comment somewhere on the Internet
This is the favorite argument of low IQ low status white males. Why should we choose cooperate in the prisoner’s dilemma, when we could just choose defect instead?
It’s a retarded argument of course, because China and India:
- Stand the most to lose from climate change and probably won’t just choose to render their countries uninhabitable.
- Even if they continue using fossil fuels we can still make a substantial difference ourselves.
- Have to import the coal from somewhere (Australian low status white males are at fault for that).
- Have to export their goods somewhere (and you can slap punishing tariffs on).
- Won’t stick to fossil fuels if more affordable alternatives are available to them (which they would be if the rest of the world were to transition). Fossil fuels grow more costly to extract, as you extract more of them. Things like algal biofuels on the other hand would become more affordable as they’re used more.
But I decided to take a time machine, to look at what low IQ low status white males in previous eras of history had to say about this.
“Why should we stop hunting whales, when the Soviets and the Japanese are just going to continue hunting them?”
-A Norwegian low IQ low status white male
“We here in Denmark are only responsible for [small percentage] of CFC emissions. If we reduce our emissions to zero, the effect on the ozone layer would be negligible. Why should we reduce our emissions, if [other country] is doing [X]? Besides, it’s all a fear-mongering hoax anyway!”
-A Danish low IQ low status white male
“Us Australians are less than [small percentage] of the allied forces. Why should we risk our lives assaulting Italian held Tobruk, when France has already surrendered to Germany and the Soviet Union has actually allied itself to the Germans?”
-An Australian low IQ low status white male
“There are millions of Irish people, but just a few thousand Choctaw. Even if we gave them all our money, it would not stop the famine. Why should we donate money to the Irish, when the British, who have far more money than we do, are just letting them starve anyway?”
-A low IQ low status red male (celebrate diversity)
“In Flanders we are just less than 1% of the world’s Christian population. The Christians in Egypt are not fighting the Saracens, they are actually paying them taxes! Why does this liberal elitist Robert II, Count of Flanders want us to join him on a crusade for the Holy Land, when it’s impossible for us to make a difference?”
-A Flemish low IQ low status white male
“Ooga Booga, Krog just one member of fifty people tribe. Why Krog must hunt and share food with everyone, when grampa Bok not hunt with me saying back hurts, pregnant Bukki does not gather berries and Buut hunts but secretly keeps meat for himself! Krog can not save tribe from hunger alone! Krog can not make difference! Krog will not share food! OOGA BOOGA!”
-A low IQ low status white male caveman
“Bleep Bloop. I am just 0.001% of T cells in our organism. I can not make a difference. Why should I migrate to the lungs, where I risk being infected by whatever virus is causing the inflammation and undergo apoptosis?”
A low IQ low status white blood cell
Next friday night
“My penis is 4 inches long, with the last inch concealed by my belly fat. My wife’s vagina is 5 inches deep. It takes me thirty seconds to orgasm, it takes her ten minutes. Why should I penetrate her, when my dick can’t make her cum anyway?”
-Low IQ low status white males to each other at their local bar when they’re not busy spreading their genius insights on the Internet.
The solution of course is very simple. If you’re going out of your way, to prevent people from cooperating to achieve a solution to a problem by spreading doubt and distrust and cynicism, you’re a traitor. In the old days we hung and quartered traitors. But today we are more enlightened, so I have a simple solution:
Climate lockdowns, but only for low status white males
Women, brown people, preachy vegans, hysterical climate alarmists and liberal elitists should be free to leave their homes. We know that they internalize the problem and so we can expect them to be responsible.
Low status white males on the other hand, should be stuck on a leash to their sofa, under climate lockdown. Ideally this would be orchestrated directly by the WEF. Once a day we’ll throw some Oatly and some tofu burgers (full of carbohydrates, with no protein, so they’re no longer in ketosis) through their window, to make sure they don’t die and release all the carbon stored in their layers of fat back into the atmosphere.