So yesterday I decided I’d set up some dating profiles. I never really did this in my twenties, because I had this notion of romantic love which I felt clashed with dating apps. But now I’m in my thirties and after two encounters with women who did not treat me very nicely and subsequent heartbreak, my pair bonding instinct is pretty much broken. I have this theory that getting laid might treat my depression. Perhaps my brain needs to be convinced that I did my job of spreading my genes.
I already have some actual matches. I don’t count the Indonesian and African ladies, because they just want someone for his money, but I have some actual matches with women in the Netherlands too. Nature has been somewhat merciful to me. I’m Caucasian, I still have my hair, I still have all my teeth, I’m not overweight and I’m 186 centimeters tall, it should be achievable to find someone.
But I find women to be strange creatures. The Netherlands is apparently full of blonde women around thirty who are very pretty but nonetheless don’t have boyfriends. What’s stopping them? It’s a mystery to me. Being a woman on a dating app means receiving an avalanche of messages from guys. Are they really that picky?
In all fairness, part of the problem may be that they start to look very interchangeable after a while. They all “love to travel”. The only video game they claim to play is Call of Duty. They love cats. They love to go to restaurants. None of them are openly right wing, but plenty of them are leftist. The stereotypically good looking blonde ones seem to be very ambitious in regards to their career (commonly referred to as “Jewish daycare”). The nerdy looking ones all seem to like anime.
I’m sure you could fall in love with one of them. The reality of online dating however is that it confronts you with the fact that when you put effort into it, as a man you could probably fall in love with half of them. The male brain is just designed to desire to pair-bond with a particular woman and experiences breakup as a trauma, in my case the pair-bonding instinct was so strong that two women made me suicidal during my twenties. Destroy the pair-bonding instinct and what’s left is the seed-spreading instinct underneath.
As you grow older as a man, you just start to realize that it really doesn’t matter that much what a woman is into. As a twenty year old I was pretty sure I wanted a woman who is into heavy metal. Now I don’t care as much. If I find a woman who is into true crime, horror movies, video games, history, goth music, renaissance fairs or urban exploration, there’s probably enough common ground to have sufficient conversation material. I will just put up with the fact that she likes Ru Paul’s drag race or some other nonsense, you just ignore their bullshit.
Strangest still are the specimens who are 36 or older and “plan on having children some day”. Do they comprehend how their own bodies operate? I’m assuming you’re going to want to take at least a year with a guy to make sure he’s the right one to reproduce with. But your fertility curve looks like this:

Your body is already falling apart, that’s why men prefer to have sex with women younger than you. Mother nature doesn’t comprehend you spent the first decade of your fertility window “studying”. Sexual desire is not some kind of blessing we control, it’s a curse that controls us.
Feminists tend to get very upset when they figure out how men experience sex, many of them become repulsed by sex with men altogether. It’s genuinely true that we intuitively experience the act of penetration as degrading, devaluing and humiliating the person who is being penetrated. That’s why we have this strange veneration of virgins. As a man you have to take a conscious effort to overcome this feeling, to have an ultimately satisfying relationship for both partners. We can do this with some effort, but our default programming is: To be penetrated by a penis is to be degraded and defiled.
You can of course as a man decide to ignore the sexual desire you have altogether or try to satiate it with masturbation, but your mind will tell you that failing to have sex makes you a “loser” and you can’t escape the feeling of humiliation and of having failed to achieve your purpose. Sex is simply a curse imposed upon us humans. And the worst part of the curse is of course that we grow attached to the act of having sex, which nature takes away from us again as we age.
What I would of course try to convince any woman I enter a relationship with is as following: Please forget about having children, don’t do it. Asian women are generally smarter than white women, you can tell by the fact that they’re about half as likely to reproduce as white women.
I just feel like illustrating again, why we need to stop having children. Here you can see CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere:

It’s a straight line up. Nothing like this has ever before happened in the history of the human race. We already screwed everything up, at today’s CO2 concentrations. The Earth is already as we speak too warm to save the coral reefs. They’re already dying, they’re being destroyed by heatwaves faster than they can naturally regenerate. The same is effectively true for the amazon rainforest, it’s already suffering droughts that are effectively killing it.
There are already numerous Amazon species in extinction debt. These are species that will die out within decades, even if we still do everything right. If you have just fifty animals left of a species, it can end up with genetic mutations accumulating that condemn it to extinction.
The human population looks like this:

We weigh more than six times as much together as all the wild terrestrial vertebrates. All the world’s lions, bears, mice, rats, kangaroos, elephants, hyenas, polecats, you name it, they weigh less than us. There are 8 billion humans. Our closest relative, the chimpanzee, has 300,000 individuals at most. That’s less than a small Chinese town. There are just 300,000 gorillas, just 120,000 orangutans. There are half a million elephants left, down from 27 million in 1800. There are too many of us and there are not enough of them.
Humans born today won’t have a nice life. I’m just going to ask you to look at India right now. There is no water. There is no electricity. It’s 48 degree Celsius. There is no air conditioning. There are 1.5 billion people living there. Those people won’t stay there. They’re going on the move. If you think real estate prices in the Western world are bad today, wait until your government starts letting the Indians in. You’re going to have Muslims and Hindus fighting each other over who gets to inherit your country.
The insects are dying out, we’re losing 1-2% of insect biomass per year. We depend on them for pollination, as food for bats and birds, for recycling nutrients in ecosystems, for digging through soil and aerating it. The world is running out of copper. We’re running out of fertile topsoil.
Nobody has any idea who’s going to pay off Japan’s national debt. Nobody has any idea who’s going to take care of the babyboomers in the nursing home. Nobody has any idea who’s going to produce food, the average age of Japanese farmers is 67, a third of their farmland will just be abandoned by 2050.
There are tailing dams everywhere, holding back giant piles of toxic sludge. Nobody has a solution, they are ticking time bombs that will eventually just spill toxic sludge all over our farmland and into our rivers. There is extremely virulent bird flu born in our chicken boilers, spreading across the globe, killing off endangered bird species and increasingly killing off mammal species too. Nobody has a solution for this.
There’s microplastics emerging everywhere, as the plastic waste we produce takes decades to turn into microplastics. The microplastics are entering our soils, where they disrupt crop growth, they’re entering the food chain, they’re entering our bodies. They’re even starting to contribute to global warming.
Smart women tend to figure this stuff out on their own and then they become depressed. The ones who haven’t figured it out yet, well, it’s better to explain this stuff to them. Then they can let go of their desire to have children, which saves them a lot of stress.
When you don’t have to worry as a woman about finding a good father for your child, then you can just continue doing what you did in your early twenties, which for most young Western women now seems to be a variety of “situationships” with popular guys who are not willing to commit to them because they want to maintain multiple options.
I really think most young women would be better off just coming to terms with the fact that our way of life is coming to an end. Try to enjoy the time we have left and try to avoid making long-term commitments to the future.
Let me spell it out – humans always amass facts that, when taken as a complete representation, severely limit their reality in ways that aren’t actually that true to the totality of existence.
Logic is sin.
Any woman who makes it to 35 without having kids doesn’t actually want to have kids (barring fertility issues). It’s not like passing the bar exam in New York state. It is just something for these ladies to blather about. However, it is easy enough even now for a 100 year old woman to have a child that is genetically hers. By cloning. All that would require would be a snippet of her skin, and a donor egg; the nucleus of the donor egg would be removed and discarded and the nucleus from a cell from her skin sample inserted (plus some lab work). It’s true that the mitochondrial DNA from the donor egg would not be hers, but it would still be even more her own kid than a regular kid. She could even hire some other female to carry the kid to term. I’m sure it’s happened already plenty of times. The process resets the telemeres, so no, the kid would not have short telemeres. Also, there has been a lot of progress made on reviving ovarian tissue (“Furthermore, evolving and experimental ovarian regenerative strategies, such as stem cell transplantation, intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, antioxidants, metabolic modulators,… Read more »
Sorry, didn’t mean to make that a reply.
I upvoted your comment and was going to say something complimentary about it, but then I realized I might thereby be seen to be supporting your fucktard posts, so refrained. But left the reply function in place by accident.
“Any woman who makes it to 35 without having kids doesn’t actually want to have kids” I’m a woman over 35, don’t have kids and never wanted any. I knew that pretty much all my life. At first I thought maybe it’s just because I just didn’t meet the right person, someone who I actually would want to have kids with, which to me had very little to do with physical attraction or money or status, but more so whether or not we were actually compatible across all factors, but then I realized, no I don’t think that’s it at all, I’m just someone who never wanted to have kids, and I definitely wouldn’t do it later in life alone with or without a man via cloning technology, because my choice not to have kids has nothing to do with not having a man, and is more about not wanting kids, plain and simple. Also, I’m not ugly and was a very beautiful child, could’ve been a child model, so nothing to do with being ugly. That being said I have two cousins and one aunt who had children by choice over the age of 40, though one of them… Read more »
I’m probably giving out too much information, but I just realized that among all my female cousins, which is like 9 or 10, all but one of them had children, and the only female cousin besides myself that never had children is happily married and always wanted kids, but couldn’t because of major reproductive problems/fertility issues, and she’s tried in vitro and it didn’t work, and she’s been morbidly obese for probably most of her life, she was a fat kid, but cute, and whether or not her obesity was a major factor I don’t know, but I guess I’m the only female in my immediate family that not only didn’t have kids, but never wanted any, so I guess that makes me an outlier.
Then you should have gone surrogate and given them a child. Then at least in one respect, you would have had both sides of the coin – a child – and also no child.
… and that child could have sat in front of the Tee Vee and watched you on Sesame Street.
Don’t own a TV, don’t watch TV, and if I had a kid they wouldn’t be watching Sesame Street.
You must have me confused with someone else. I’m not yellow, Retard!
No, I would never do that. I would never ever be someone’s surrogate, wouldn’t even do it for a billion dollars, nor would I sell my eggs, or my blood, or my plasma, or any other body parts that I could live without. If I were going to carry a child inside me I would have it, but I’d rather be dead then to ever give birth, and if anyone raped me and pregnancy was the result, I’d kill em.
You do it for free, to continue your genetic bloodline – otherwise, you go extinct and the Indians and the Africans take over. Even the Chinese are going extinct.
> Also, I’m not ugly and was a very beautiful child, could’ve been a child model, so nothing to do with being ugly.
Wow, and you also told us before that you look twenty years younger than your chronological age! You are totes amazeballs Big Bird! I wish that I could be as awesome as you! God bless you! Hugs and kisses! 🙂
Didn’t you tell us the other week that you were planning on permanently leaving this blog to live in a secluded off-grid log cabin in the middle of the wilderness? When might that be happening?
Plans change dip shit. Though it is true that I was a beautiful child and do in fact look significantly younger than my age, but looking youthful or physically attractive is not really that important in the grand scheme of things, other than it being a reflection of good health, and does not make me or anyone else with those qualities more amazing than you or anyone else. I only mentioned it because it’s relevant to the topic of older women who chose not to have kids or get married or even date.
You need to be respectful – and you need an Arab husband to teach you how to be respectful.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SFlBLbH69d8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6ql5Se7zj70
The most horrific Saudi drift crash I ever watched was a high speed rollover involving four occupants where the extremely high centrifugal forces of the constantly flipping car caused their arms and legs to be ripped off and ejected from the windows, flying high into the sky. Rest in peace, speed kills unfortunately.
Fucko, I’ve read your comment over and over trying to make sense of it.
I think I know what you’re trying to say but the sentence isn’t grammatically correct somehow.
I asked my fake and gay AI that runs on my server in my garage: Q: Explain what this means? “Let me spell it out – humans always amass facts that, when taken as a complete representation, severely limit their reality in ways that aren’t actually that true to the totality of existence. Logic is sin.” A: The quote suggests two main ideas: Humans tend to focus on accumulating discrete pieces of information (facts) rather than seeing the bigger picture. When people collect facts, they often try to fit everything into a structured system or model. However, this approach can limit how we perceive reality because it treats existence as fragmented and compartmentalized. Logic is seen as “sin” in this context. Logic relies on clear rules, definitions, and binary thinking (true/false). The quote implies that by strictly following logical frameworks—such as mathematics, formal logic, or scientific laws—we may overlook the fluidity, ambiguity, and interconnectedness of reality. In other words, trying to impose rigid logical structures can prevent us from fully grasping the complexity and mystery of existence. In essence, the message is a philosophical critique: while facts and logic are useful tools for understanding parts of the world, they can… Read more »
Thanks, I love artificial intelligence.
Enjoy your pegging video.
I did. It involved The Prince of Pegging – and boy could he peg. He pegged like German royalty. It was called Filthy Fourth Hole Mole.
ChatGPT: Is this sentence grammatically correct? “Let me spell it out – humans always amass facts that, when taken as a complete representation, severely limit their reality in ways that aren’t actually that true to the totality of existence.” Yes. The sentence is grammatically correct, though it’s philosophically dense and slightly awkward in a few places. The main issue is stylistic clarity rather than grammar. A few notes: “that true to” sounds a bit unnatural. Native speakers would more often say: “aren’t actually true to” “don’t fully reflect” “aren’t faithful to” “their reality” could be interpreted ambiguously — either reality itself or their perception of reality. Here’s a cleaner version that preserves your meaning: “Let me spell it out — humans always amass facts that, when taken as a complete representation, severely limit their perception of reality in ways that aren’t actually true to the totality of existence.” Or, if you want it more philosophical and fluid: “Let me spell it out — humans always amass facts that, when mistaken for a complete representation of reality, severely limit their understanding in ways that fail to reflect the totality of existence.” Your original works grammatically, but tightening the phrasing makes the… Read more »
Your robot is right. I’m also going to point out that the scriptures say, lean not on your own understanding, trust not the arm of flesh. I wasn’t being metaphorical about logic being inherently sinful. This is a deeper level of clarity.
My observation is that the problem is moreso that people are really, really dumb. So they often don’t know how to think critically, or they confuse hypotheses with facts, or they overgeneralize a specific situation, or they believe things that are convenient for them personally but aren’t actually true, or any number of other things.
There are other ways to think and perceive reality than just purely logically. Things like intuition are important as well, but you need to have both. And intuition can help you at times to figure out if you’ve unwittingly boxed yourself into some epistemological corner. But most people behave as though they have neither. And the situation is made even worse if they aren’t fundamentally honest people, which is unfortunately kind of common.
If you want to believe in logic, you’re free to do that, but eventually you’re going to run into something so absurd that turns your life and your understanding of truth on its head, like a Lovecraft story. When that time comes, you will have to face the fact that whatever theory of reality you form from then on is going to be just as limited and subject to being overturned in a dramatic collision with a greater reality as the model you replaced. You’re going to realize at some point that we’re all flying blind, and that the only people who believe otherwise either can’t face this limitation honestly or haven’t run into it yet. There’s two types of people in the world – people who stick their heads in the sand, and people who stare the unknowable and vast absurdity in the face and perform what Kiyomasa described as the only duty of the samurai: to draw the long and short swords and then die. That’s what I respect about our host – at his core he understands this reality, at least underneath the ennui that takes over whenever he’s gone so long without seeing any glitches in… Read more »
If you want to believe in logic, you’re free to do that, but eventually you’re going to run into something so absurd that turns your life and your understanding of truth on its head, like a Lovecraft story. Seriously? I thought I had made it overwhelmingly clear by now that I was already in this situation, and have been for years. I used to be a scientific materialist six or seven years back. My supernatural eldritch horror lovecraftian creepypasta experiences are exactly why I’m NOT like that anymore. That doesn’t mean you have to be retarded, or give up on understanding anything at all. That’s just intellectual laziness. You can still use logic, it is just working in a different context. For example, it is possible from the available information to conclude logically that this reality in its present form was intentionally created by a malevolent being. There are many other things that you can logically deduce as well, if you actually pay attention to what is going on around you. It is possible to discern a lot about the motivations of the archons, how this reality actually works behind the scenes, certain things about our origin before this world,… Read more »
I’m already heavily involved in energetics, I’m just posting from a place of gloom.
“ You need the assistance of intuition, energy work, and other modes of understanding to reach certain insights. Giving up on ‘logic’ will only cripple you, however.”
Everything you fear is waiting with slavering jaws in Chapel Perilous, but if you are armed with the Wand of Intuition, the Cup of Sympathy, the Sword of Reason, and the Pentacle of Valor, you will find there (the legends say) the Medicine of Metals, the Elixir of Life, the Philosopher’s Stone, True Wisdom and Perfect Happiness.
If you go into that realm without the Sword of Reason, you will lose your mind; but at the same time, if you take only the Sword of Reason without the Cup of Sympathy, you will lose your heart. Even more remarkably, if you approach without the Wand of Intuition, you can stand at the door for decades without realizing you have arrived.
— Robert Anton Wilson
https://www.amazon.com/Cosmic-Trigger-Final-Secret-Illuminati/
(R.A.W. was an optimist. I am not, for the record).
Also no I’ve not been paying attention to your personal affairs, I didn’t even know you posted about them. Just for clarity
*slow golf clap*
Why are we back again to South East Asian women being far better at breeding and keeping their man happy?
“Smart women tend to figure this stuff out on their own and then they become DEPRESSED. The ones who haven’t figured it out yet, well, it’s better to explain this stuff to them.”
_________________
Another thought provoking essay.
But it’s ideas I disagree with that spur me to comment more than ideas I agree with. I guess it’s my contrarian nature to want to debate.
Does being smart really affect the desire to have children? Elon Musk is busy breeding. 14 so far? But he’s not a woman.
“Smart” modern women want the approbation and validation of being successful in their careers and cap off their lives with children, but putting off or rejecting family has nothing to do with global warming or mining tailings, or shouldn’t. It’s more about economics.
Humans have been reproducing through far worse times than now, which is the most comfortable period ever, and we barely survived as a species to ultimately dominate the planet.
Artificial birth control makes a huge difference in altering human evolution. You could have mentioned that.
Fuck it, I’ll just post this classic scene from Idiocracy.
https://youtu.be/WUSCpw_tcBg?si=gIFn0bZkM4gx4lDA
“Does being smart really affect the desire to have children? Elon Musk is busy breeding. 14 so far? But he’s not a woman.”
Yeah, I think there’s definitely a correlation between having a higher IQ and having fewer or no children. The people with lowest IQ reproduce like rabbits, like Mexicans and black people, primarily because having a low IQ is associated with lack of impulse control. They just want instant gratification and aren’t bothered with thinking about the consequences to their actions until it’s too late.
I think Musk’s IQ is exaggerated, and all he really does it buy up other people’s companies, hire people who are significantly smarter than he is and who do all the work, in which he then takes the credit for. Also, his first three kids were triplets, and his oldest is transgender and changed his last name and wants nothing to do with him, and Musk has proceeded to go on a humping spree with pretty much any willing woman who will have him, and he doesn’t have to be actively involved in actually raising them and being a father, but they’ll all be financially taken care of, or at least we hope.
I wonder if your obsession about reproduction is partly due to being a first born (I think you may be one) and therefore seeing yourself as responsible for the status and future of your family. There is very little that is rational about having kids and almost nothing that is ethical, but it is still painful to give up some of the joys of having relatives; a meagre joy is still a joy. In my case there is so much depression in my family that reproducing would have been sadistic, so it was an easy choice. So this affects your dating decisions; if you ended up getting a woman pregnant “by accident” then suddenly your life would have meaning and you would be performing your proper family and social role. Movie has happy ending and no more time for a blog. Just as for women, a baby solves the problem of the meaning of life for men (since you are stuck, if you are a decent person). So it is terrifying but a huge draw at the same time. Of course there is also the sex as such but I think this is an extra factor. And once you have… Read more »
“in my case the pair-bonding instinct was so strong that two women made me suicidal during my twenties. Destroy the pair-bonding instinct and what’s left is the seed-spreading instinct underneath.”
Enough said.
What’s your point? That he should get with a dude? That he shouldn’t be bothering at all with women at at, since you view all females as evil and inferior and intellectually retarded, and by that implication he should get with you instead? Is this why you are here, as a middle aged gay cruiser preying on impressionable sensitive young men to turn them on to your evil ways?
Just kidding. But really, what’s your point? Please do elaborate.
@Rintrah “in my case the pair-bonding instinct was so strong that two women made me suicidal during my twenties. Destroy the pair-bonding instinct and what’s left is the seed-spreading instinct underneath.”
@Mehen “Enough said.”
People don’t make people suicidal unless they actually put a gun to your head and pull the trigger and then put the gun in your hand.
People don’t make people suicidal unless they are lab rats being experimented on in a MKULTRA experiment.
Dude got rejected by a woman and it was as if his world was destroyed, when really it was just a bad match and he refused to accept it.
His point is that women can always be replaced with a BBC Fleshlight 6000 Max.
If that were true he wouldn’t be going on the dating site.
Even if this world was Eden there would still be no meaning.
Imagine going to great lengths just to get a date. How silly of us men.
And for what? To try tricking the brain into satisfaction and melt the doom away? I feel for you. Please stop.
Relax—you’re trying to fight a shadow. Drop the entire thing altogether; it’s that simple. You can’t do shit for the orangutans beyond what you’ve done. Congratulations.
Now, you are still looking above standing down inside the pit. Here, this is a start:
Do this whenever you feel like it, but do. A sincere habit will pay in no time.
What the fuck are you waiting for?
You are overthinging this. You can date just for fun and sex. That’s called having a friend with benefits. She doesn’t have to have anyting in common with you. She can have a weird personality, so long as she is nice to you. The only criteria for a FWB is attractive enough to fuck. Get over any ideas that this is being “mean”. Women like sex too.
You can date more than one woman at a time. If you do, they will tend to treat you better knowing you have options. If one of them somehow has things in common with you, you can upgrade her (in your mind) to girlfriend, or even wife.
The whole rant about the environment is off topic, so I skipped it. Try to stop lecturing the world about your pet peeves. This is more proof that you overthink everything. It is just ridiculous to think there’s a single human that hasn’t heard this 1 million times, but you have something unique to add.
OT: I recently discovered this YouTube channel. Rad might find the following interesting if he’s in the mood for some way far-out (but intelligent and informed) schizo-theorizing:
https://youtu.be/AZLk0K5KMX0?si=fSTUbaelCcuogZI4
TIL about “Ahriman” as conceived by Rudolph Steiner: ———- I think you may be referring to Ahriman in the teachings of Rudolf Steiner. In Steiner’s spiritual cosmology, Ahriman is a powerful spiritual being representing: • materialism, • cold intellect, • mechanization, • rigidity, • reductionism, • and the denial of spiritual reality. Steiner adapted the name from the evil spirit Angra Mainyu / Ahriman in ancient Zoroastrianism, but developed it into his own unique metaphysical framework. Ahriman vs. Lucifer in Steiner’s System One of Steiner’s central ideas was that humanity is pulled between two opposing spiritual distortions: Luciferic forces Associated with: • fantasy, • ecstatic spirituality, • pride, • escapism, • dissociation from earthly reality. Lucifer tempts humans “upward” into excessive spiritualization. Ahrimanic forces Associated with: • hyper-rationalism, • soulless technology, • bureaucratic control, • nihilistic materialism, • seeing humans as machines. Ahriman tempts humans “downward” into total identification with matter and calculation. Steiner believed healthy human development required balancing these poles through what he identified with the Christ impulse. Why Ahriman Matters in Anthroposophy Steiner thought modern civilization was becoming increasingly “Ahrimanic.” He saw signs of this in: • industrialization, • purely materialist science, • technocracy, • financial abstraction,… Read more »
I’m heartened that this autist recognized the metaphysical significance of Drum&Bass/Jungle music, as I shared a few classic tracks on this blog some weeks ago.
I rule
Musicology discussions of Jungle and Drum & Bass often describe them as more than just dance music. They became expressions of urban psychological atmosphere, technology, multicultural fusion, and late-modern intensity. Jungle came first Jungle emerged in early-1990s Britain, especially in London, out of: • rave culture • reggae and dub sound system culture • hip-hop breakbeats • dancehall • hardcore electronic music It was heavily shaped by Black British Caribbean influences, especially Jamaican bass culture. The music used: • chopped breakbeats • extremely heavy bass • sampled voices • fast tempos • chaotic rhythmic layering The result sounded restless, paranoid, euphoric, futuristic, and sometimes almost militaristic. Why it felt culturally important For many people, Jungle sounded like: • the feeling of modern city life • multicultural Britain colliding together • technological acceleration • alienation mixed with ecstasy • survival energy Critics often described it as “urban futurism.” It captured the sensation of living inside a rapidly changing world. There’s also a strong association with: • pirate radio • underground nightlife • marginalized youth culture • anti-establishment identity So Jungle carried a kind of outlaw energy. ⸻ Drum & Bass evolved from Jungle By the mid-to-late 1990s, Drum & Bass evolved… Read more »
I will leave you all with this classic D&B track “Rings Around Saturn” by “Photek” (a white boy, aka “Rupert Parkes”)
https://youtu.be/gpryFZtdM0A?si=f5PJTwc37rbq2BnG
It’s quite soothing.
(Subwoofers recommended).
In my considered opinion, Bjork presaged the best of D&B with her song “Hyperballad” https://youtu.be/6CSiU0j_lFA?si=TDnNKAJjSTLBQS1F (To any musicians reading: the loping half-time feel is peppered with double-time percussion) The lyrics are appropriate for a truly feminine woman: —————— We live on a mountain, right at the top This beautiful view from the top of the mountain Every morning, I walk towards the edge And throw little things off Like car parts, bottles, and cutlery Or whatever I find lying around It’s become a habit, a way to start the day I go through all this Before you wake up So I can feel happier To be safe up here with you I go through all this Before you wake up So I can feel happier To be safe up here with you It’s early morning, no one is awake I’m back at my cliff, still throwing things off I listen to the sounds they make on their way down I follow with my eyes ’til they crash I Imagine what my body would sound like slamming against those rocks And when it lands Will my eyes be closed or open? I go through all this Before you wake up So… Read more »
You write so Well, You should write for some lind of inrternational magazine!
Now that you’ve said all that, I want you to take a moment, not hold anything back, and tell us how you REALLY feel 😉