One of the problems you run into with a population of eight billion people is that at some point, you’re increasingly left with nothing to say, except for things that have already been said.
So today I want to point out the biggest problem with blocking the sun to address global warming. This is not revolutionary new information, but it’s still worth noting.
I’m assuming you already realize blocking the sun won’t solve ocean acidification. The ocean’s PH value right now is looking as following:
It’s a flat line downwards, to levels that have not been observed in tens of millions of years. This means all sorts of organisms with a calcium shell are now having their shell dissolved. For us humans, it means it gets very difficult to grow foods like oysters and mussels.
But here’s the biggest problem you’re dealing with: Climate change causes warming, by making it harder for radiation to escape our atmosphere. Blocking the sun reduces warming, by making it harder for sunlight to enter our atmosphere.
This means you’re getting the exact wrong effect. Climate change mainly causes warming at night, rather than during the day. It mainly causes warming in winter, rather than the summer. It mainly causes warming near the poles, rather than the equator. Why? All because it’s a problem of trapping heat.
So what happens when you block the sun? The opposite. You can use reflective dust in space, or you can use sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere, the Silicon Valley techbros are really eager to try these methods, because it’s a cheap way to reduce warming.
But when you block the sun, you mostly reduce warming during the day, you mostly reduce warming during the summer and you mostly reduce warming near the equator. The effect is that you mostly just eliminate the temperature gradient that exists on our planet.
You end up with a planet that may not suffer lethal heatwaves, but there won’t be freezing winters either. Who cares? That’s what I hope to explain to you today. We really need our cold winters and I’m going to show you why.
For starters, there’s huge amounts of carbon stored in the permafrost. When you get rid of our freezing winters, that carbon will start to escape into our air.
You also end up destroying the weather patterns we naturally have. Those weather patterns depend on the jet stream. The jet stream becomes very wavery, when you lose the temperature difference between the poles and the equator. That means cold polar weather can suddenly invade the United States and destroy crops during spring.
And finally, what I think would be the biggest problem: You know what helps keep our ecosystems stable? Cold, freezing winters. Why don’t we have African tropical parasites in our soils in Europe and North America, like Schistosomiasis, that infects 250 million people every year? Because they die in freezing weather.
Why don’t the insects that kill the Ash trees spread into Canada? Because they die in very cold temperatures. You need very cold winters every once in a while, because otherwise all the pests and parasites you find in tropical countries also start affecting temperate countries. There’s a reason countries far from the equator are so successful: The climate really helps us out.
Most important perhaps, are the insects that eat our crops. You know about the desert locust, they have historically been farmers main enemy, they’re mentioned as one of the plagues in Egypt. Well, the desert locust expands its range when the climate warms up. They have a minimum temperature of 15.1 degree Celsius for embryonic development.
What is the most important factor determining the spread of the desert locust? The minimum temperature of the coldest month. That’s why even in the best case climate scenario, the area of the Earth where the desert locusts will show up will increase by 50% compared to current conditions:
But what happens when you block the sun? You’re mainly reducing the maximum temperatures, rather than keeping the minimum temperature of the coldest month low. In other words, it won’t really help to keep the locusts out.
You have to figure out how to keep your freezing winter temperatures, because our ability to deal with freezing temperatures against which insects and parasites are no match is part of what allowed us to build civilization.
Join the movement! pic.twitter.com/ayAJjQ3xeM
— WILL STANCIL 4 PRESIDENT (@votewillstancil) November 29, 2025
Low IQ low status white males tend to say that CO2 is plant food. And they’re right of course. But who is going to eat those plants? Well, when you lose your cold winters, the answer may very well be: Desert locusts, rather than low IQ low status white males!
So my advice to American low IQ low status white males is: Be like those green European hysterical climate alarmists, sell your SUV and start riding a bicycle, because blocking the sun isn’t going to solve this!
test comment 4 the lulz
I asked our A.I. Overlords (Gemini 3 Pro) to analyse your previous article on climate change. The following is an excerpt:
> The Timeline Error: ECS vs. TCR
> The Blog’s Claim: “If we hit 450 ppm as early as 2035… 3 degree by 2050 unfortunately looks very plausible.”
> The Scientific Error:
> This is the most significant technical error in the blog post. The author confuses ECS (Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity) with TCR (Transient Climate Response).
> ECS (Equilibrium): This is how much the world warms after CO2 doubles and the planet has had centuries to adjust. It takes hundreds of years for the deep oceans to warm up and for ice sheets to melt enough to reach this equilibrium.
> TCR (Transient): This is the warming we see at the moment we double CO2. TCR is always significantly lower than ECS because the oceans are still absorbing heat.
> The Reality: Even if the “radicals” are right and ECS is 4.8°C, we would not see 3°C of warming by 2050 simply because we reach 450ppm. The thermal inertia of the oceans prevents the temperature from spiking that instantly. We would likely face that warming over the coming centuries, not the next two decades.
…
So I certainly hope that you’re wrong about the timing and rate of warming. IIRC Hansen is predicting slightly more than 2 degrees by mid-century, not 3 degrees. Only the most “fringe” (no offense) doomers like you and Richard Crim are forecasting 3 degrees by 2050. Of course, in the long run humanity is screwed anyway, it’s just a matter of how quickly it happens.
Unless we get that “surprise” in Perth…
P.S. nice to see you back blogging, hope you’re feeling better.
We are already at 1.8 degrees. We are headed to 3 degrees by 2035, 5.5 degrees by 2050 and 10-12 degrees by 2100, with most humans extinct by 2060 – hence the Covid cull. TPTB wish for the human and mass species die-off to be peaceful, not violent. 2020 was the ideal time. By 2030, things will start to become noticeable (the exponential phase) and the mass public would have become suspicious of the real reason for the injections.
P.S. – using AI is for retarded NPC’s. Yes, I am retarded, because I am a retard – but I am not THAT retarded and I am not an NPC.
>I asked our A.I. Overlords
Maybe next time try reading the study I linked to instead of consulting a chatbot.
It has this massive image:
So do me a favor, when I post a link, which I did, click the link, before arguing with me in the comments and trying to prove that the chatbot proved me wrong.
I’m really not asking much here people.
Note:
This isn’t just one scenario by the way, this is the only temperature projection they included in the graph.
The smart ones among you will have noticed it’s RCP8.5. But RCP8.5 is what we’re tracking in terms of greenhouse forcing, which Hansen noted here:
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2025/ColorfulChart.21November2025.pdf
So if you don’t like it, go to the authors of the study and complain to them for choosing that temperature projection, or argue with Hansen himself I guess.
What you are quoting is the 2025 model. You also need to track the gamma – i.e. the rate that the models keep increasing. For example, what will be the realistic projection model in 2030, 2035, etc? As the years pass, the models keep increasing.
Cackle.
Fuck AI.
At this stage, I feel like I’ve moved beyond the need for anything other than the evidence of my own eyes:
Too many humans? Check.
Too much consumption? Check.
World going to fuck? Check.
Hello LSWM Lives Matter. ( ^_^)／
Hello CV/SYM 🙂
Why did you get banned from X/Twitter?
Still going on long walks and fasting?
Hello fren! 😀
I deleted my account but I just reactivated it. I was trolling again and I got troll’s remorse. I’m gonna keep it open but not gonna shitpost like I used to I’ve decided.
I’ve been kind of a lazy fatass lately ngl, living the spirit of my country. I need to do better tbh.
Have you taken anymore shrooms LSWM Lives Matter?
No, not recently, took just a small dose back in the Spring but none since then, but I really should, been struggling with pretty bad insomnia and low mood lately, I wanna try ketamine too, what about you? Just weed, or shrooms too? Any ICE raids where you live in PNW?
Trying the Elon Musk drug? Sounds dangerous. You might wake up and find yourself as a tech billionaire LSWM Lives Matter. Could you imagine the horror?
I’ve just been smoking weed and drinking Kratom lately. I should get a hold of some shrooms, but poor and they’re expensive. (We get get them from the local pot shop for $40 a bar/gummy container. People say those are all fake but you can actually look up what’s in the ones we get. Praise Washington State!)
I don’t think very many ICE raids are occurring over here tbh.
One thing I really want to try sometime is Mescaline.
lol.
I must say, the transformation of your online persona over the last year or two has been quite interesting, to say the least. To go from calling yourself Hermann Göring on Twitter to now being an avid Kamala Harris supporter. Truly remarkable.
This is why Space X was set up by TPTB. Some things simply cannot be done in secret with public agencies. It is not about “going to Mars”. This is the fake distraction story. The job of Space X is to collect and then spread moon dust into orbit around the Earth to block the sun. By 2050 Earth will only be able to feed 2 billion people max – hence the Covid / Vax combo – the slow multi-generational self-replicating depopulation biological cull of humans.
I’ve missed you Retard – tell me more about the moon dust. . .
I’m liking this community being open again – it’s like a Christmas miracle.
Thank you Rintrah.
TPTB are trying to keep things as “normal” as possible for as long as possible – i.e. keep the current wealth inequality and the socioeconomic power structure exactly as it is now – for as long as is practicably possible. When “normal” is no longer possible, then the iron fist of data center monitored population control will be implemented.
To avoid a Children of Men situation arising (all of humanity knowing that they will soon be extinct), the hopium project will be announced – Space X and their mega-gaga-moon rocket and the moon-dust project. It will not work however, but that is not the aim of the project. The project is designed to give people hope – which is a very powerful psychological tool – as the Nigerian scamsters can vouch for.
This is why the fake “Climate Change” narrative was devised back in 1990. For example, NYC being underwater and the polar ice caps melted by 2020. It was designed to make half the population in 2020 doubt that it is real, and make the other half think that it will not be that bad, and not really their problem to deal with because they will be dead. This is why “2100” was always used. You can always tell a psyop because it is designed to divide the NPCs and have them argue with each other.
TPTB knew by 1985 that End Permian Period scale global warming (95% extinction level warming) was already baked in and unavoidable by 2060 – even if all carbon emissions stopped the very next day. For me, I knew also in 1985. Since then I was awaiting the cull. I was surprised that it took so long, because the plasmid-DNA / modRNA technology was already mature by the mid 90s.
It’s very likely that the Dzhanibekov rotation of the earth’s crust due to exothermic core-mantle decoupling will happen before 2060, eliminating 95% or more of earth’s population. Just like the one that happened circa 4400 BC that gave us the tale of Noah’s flood and scores of other ancient flood myths from around the world, and the previous one that happened circa 11,000 BC. See Ethical Skeptic’s site for details. Our rulers know this is coming, so I don’t get why they would put much effort into depopulation before that.
It’s really wonderful to see comments here again! Thank you, Rintrah!
Excellent! I hate 95% of humans.
I don’t know. The “vaccines” have left a trail of damage, but don’t seem very effective at widescale killing. On the ecological front there are horrors, but most of us probably won’t live long enough to see a great die off of humans. Socially, western culture already died, but the worms wriggling in its corpse keep it moving. Economically, it’s a Ponzi that should’ve collapsed already. . . Decades pass, and there seems to be no limit to how bad things can get without a major terminating event. Our continued existence appears to be a miracle that only ends when God decides to stop breathing life into it.
Hey, Big Bird here, still reading. I’ll try not to be confrontational but just thought I’d point out that geoengineering and climate change are interconnected phenomena, and it’s not something happening due to incompetence, or even greed, it’s a premeditated plan to depopulate the planet, to mind control the surviving population, and to create a slave class of zombies used as batteries to power the data centers fueling their demonic AI cult, which ultimately seeks the death of humanity as we know it.
ok
You are correct on one point. The Neuro-link BS is not about the AI augmenting the human. It is more about using endless vast warehouses stacked full of vegetative human and primate zombie brains, kept alive by life-support machines powering the AI. This is the only way that AI can work in a practical sense, because of Second Law Efficiency (Exergy Efficiency).
I thought the big problem with blocking the sun, at least short term, was that it was terrible for harvests. It always has been when a volcano has erupted. “By analyzing the past effects of Earth-cooling volcanic eruptions, and the response of crops to changes in sunlight, the team concluded that any improvements in yield from cooler temperatures would be negated by lower productivity due to reduced sunlight.” (https://news.berkeley.edu/2018/08/08/blocking-sunlight-to-cool-earth-wont-reduce-crop-damage-from-global-warming/).
Yes, there’s that too, I have mentioned this before.
Yes, you have.
Hi Kareninca,
just wanted to say thank you for the tip with Fisetin – I had tried it for about 3 months and my gum got much better – so thanks a lot for this. 🙂
Have a good life
Erik
I am very happy to hear that!!!
I am still taking it, of course (600 mg. once every five days), and it continues to be a huge help.
Now look into lumbrokinase. Unfortunately it is derived from earthworms but I am taking it anyway since it makes me functional in ways I would not have expected (basically I can deal with my elderly mom’s extreme care needs at a distance; that would have killed me off already if I weren’t taking it).
A unfortunate thing about the acidification of the oceans is that farming bivalves on a larger scale would have been a great sustainable food source. They filter pollutants like nitrogen out of the ocean, are incredibly efficient and relatively clean production wise, and it’s more ethical since they don’t have brains.
Also it’s pretty sad to think about the Ocean being acidified in general. That happening during the Permian Extinction wiped out like 99% of Marine life. Genuses like Trilobites that had existed since complex life really got established went extinct. Hopefully it’s not as dramatic this time around.
I have nothing meaningful to add to the discussion at hand, but I am glad to see you writing again.
Oh no the Pleiadians got Fucko.
His writing is EXCELLENT and appreciated.
That it is Charlie. We appreciate you so much Radagast!
Tis very nice to see you are back.
BLOCKING THE SUN sounds like about as good an idea as injecting the entire human population with lipid nanoparticles loaded with experimental gene therapy.
I mean, what could possibly go wrong??
Glad the crew is back, didn’t realize how much I missed you guys.
Hey Rintrah,
Finally, we both agree on one thing completely, albeit for completely different reasons.
Sun blocking is bad!
Isnt’t that great? Even though we think each other is crazy?
Hey Rintrah, I’m glad to hear from you and it’s also nice to see everyone else commenting too.
I’m going to try not be confrontational too like Big Bird, especially now that I have my own space to rant at the state of the world without feeling like I have to get into an individual 1-v-1 fight with you or anyone else, which is not something I really enjoy and is probably bad for everyone involved.
In terms of your post I think the ultimate problem with all techno-utopian solutions (whether blocking the sun, living underwater, or whatever) is that we simply don’t have any of the trust, expertise, wealth, etc necessary to pull them off.
I mean you have entire scientific fields that are collapsing due to fraud, the infrastructure in the average Western country is a mess, politicians can’t even agree on basic facts, yet we’re going to redesign the entire human ecosystem and have that work perfectly? I don’t trust the stooges in charge of everything these days to run the existing system efficiently, let alone build something even grander.
I imagine a lot of scams and overextended Ponzis will just crash, and the main thing is to hope we get lucky and they deflate slowly, rather than getting a Chernobyl-style (or worse) meltdown.
Then whatever solutions the people picking up the pieces implement will be more humble and honest, working within the existing systems and methods we already have, not desperately reaching for some sci-fi utopia which is totally beyond the current society.
And all of this is true regardless of whether anyone philosophy or morally agrees or disagree with the whole concept of utopian techno-engineering, I just think it’s impossible under the current circumstances.
Oh no another lab leak. You think they could be a little more careful.
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/spain-investigating-whether-swine-fever-outbreak-was-caused-by-laboratory-leak-2025-12-05/