The Great Replacement: A guide to the end of Europe, for the people who were never asked

“My gripe is that we were never asked.”

What the leftists/establishment types will tend to argue is that the idea of the “great replacement” is a xenophobic conspiracy theory, because it dares to imply that the ongoing demographic transformation of Europe is intentional. According to the BBC: “It’s a racist far-right conspiracy theory that falsely states there’s a secret plan to replace white people through increased immigration and other means.”

The reality is, that there isn’t really anything secret about any of this. Policy-making elites have been pretty straightforward in explaining that European nations have low birth rates and to make up for the top-heavy demographic pyramid, which results in an excess of pensioners compared to workers, they will be dependent on what they call “replacement migration”.

The United Nations published a document in 2000 called “Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” In it, they explicitly recommend that:

The new challenges being brought about by declining and ageing populations will require objective, thorough and comprehensive reassessments of many established economic, social and political policies and programmes. Such reassessments will need to incorporate a long-term perspective. Critical issues to be addressed in those reassessments would include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health-care benefits for the elderly; (c) the labour-force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health-care benefits for the increasing elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular replacement migration, and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

They make it pretty clear: If you want to keep the pension system functional and don’t want to dramatically increase the retirement age, you’re going to need what they call “replacement migration”. Not my words, theirs. It means you’re going to need to replace the native populations of low-fertility countries, with non-native populations.

How is that anything, other than a “great replacement”? Well, they argue you’re wrong for pointing out what’s obviously happening, by putting up a ridiculous strawman: “Jews want to replace white people with non-white people because Jews just don’t like white people.” And then if you point out: “Hey, we’re being replaced.” They can say: “Oh my God! You’re a dog-whistling racist antisemitic far-right conspiracy theorist!”

Sorry, it’s just open policy. It’s what the UN recommends to policymakers. In 2012, the BBC reported that Peter Sutherland, the United Nation’s special representative for migration, said that the European Union should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states. Why? Because “the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural” according to Sutherland. Otherwise they won’t have enough working adults.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t have high status white males like Sutherland suggest that national homogeneity in Europe should be undermined and European countries should undergo “replacement migration”, only to then call low status white males far-right conspiracy theorists when they point out that they’re being replaced.

But who are they, these angry far-right low status white males? It’s very simple. They are the people who were never asked, but who have had to live out their lives with the consequences. And more importantly: They are the people whose children have had to live with the consequences. Children, like those in Rotherham, who never had any say in the matter, but will have to live out their entire lives with the consequences.

This is the schizophrenic attitude you see whenever low status white males bring up the demographic reality of the great replacement: It’s not happening! And alright, it is happening, but it’s not intentional! But let’s say it was happening. Well we’re all just human and it’s racist to suggest otherwise! Another useless academic, Cecil Jenkins, “debunks” the “great replacement theory” by explaining that:

As for the grand replacement, this has been widely seen as a paranoid fantasy, which plays fast and loose with the statistics, is racist in that it classes as immigrants people actually born in France, glosses over the fact that around half of immigrants are from other European countries, and suggests that declining indigenous France will be outbred by Muslim newcomers when in fact it has the highest fertility rate in Western Europe, and not because of immigration.

So, because Arabs are born to Arab parents in France, you’re not being “replaced”, you are in fact “racist” and have actually succumbed to a “paranoid fantasy”, because we can’t consider Arabs born in France as immigrants. If you tried this logic elsewhere, you would find that Native Americans in the US were never being replaced, because at any given moment most of the white population was in fact born in America!

I’ll keep it simple: It is in fact pretty obvious and pretty inevitable that Europeans are being “replaced” by non-Europeans. Demographics is destiny. Every year Ethiopia has more births than the entire EU put together. And of those births in the EU, a growing share won’t be of European heritage. In Brussels, the capital of the EU, less than 10% of births are to people whose ancestry is Belgian.

The “great replacement” at this point is just a demographic inevitability due to climate change and birth rates. Ethiopia alone has more births than the EU every year. India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have 2 billion people who will seek to move elsewhere as the subcontinent becomes uninhabitable. What I don’t quite understand is why leftists still try to deny the great replacement is real. It’s obviously a global transformation that is inevitable at this point.

I think what’s actually going on, is that leftist policymakers and opinion-makers are themselves uncomfortable with the inevitable outcome of the policies they have spent their whole lives pushing: The idea that indigenous Europeans are going to die out is uncomfortable for them at a deeper instinctive level, the kind of level they yearn to believe their intellect has elevated them above, so when right-wingers in tune with their instincts point it out, they declare the idea to be an outrageous conspiracy theory.

Here’s an example. Leo Lucassen writes: “Theory ‘minority in own country’ is deeply racist.” Why is it “deeply racist”? Well, this guy pulls out the “we’re all human” theory. After two or three generations, immigrant populations are supposedly no longer immigrants, but have assimilated. And the evidence he proposed is, that Amsterdam in 1640 was 40% composed of people not born in the Netherlands!

Let’s see, where did those people come from? We had Germans, Scandinavians, French Huguenots (protestants), as well as protestants from Belgium. Those were the majority of those immigrants, Germanic people who moved into a neighboring country that wasn’t even recognized as independent yet, we were in the middle of a continent-wide era of religious upheaval. We had the 80 year war at the time and the Germans were still in the middle of the 30 year war.

There were also Sephardic Jews entering Amsterdam at the time, who in fact did not assimilate into the overall Dutch population and thus serve as evidence against the thesis. How any of this is supposed to serve as evidence that after two or three generations everyone blends into the same population indistinguishable from the natives is a mystery to me.

Now what actually happens when immigrants move to Europe from outside Europe is easy to demonstrate, because we have one single clear case study: The Roma. The Roma, also known as gypsies, began to leave India 1500 years ago and began moving into Europe 900 years ago. In other words, they have had 900 years to assimilate into European culture. Did this happen? No. They are still distinguishable as Roma, as people with a nomadic Indian-origin culture, who speak a language that is identifiable as Indian.

That’s the only significant example we have of non-Europeans moving into Europe since the decline of the Roman empire, with the exception of the Jews, most of whom did not assimilate into the European population either. Both groups remained identifiable as people with a very different culture and way of life, for over a thousand years.

What we are expected to believe by the “debunkers” of the “great replacement theory”, is that unlike the Roma and the Jews, the only two populations that moved into Europe in significant numbers before the second half of the 20th century, the people now moving into Europe will somehow cease to be non-European in nature once they’re born on European soil. Why? Well, that’s just how it works, ok?

To suggest otherwise, that like the Roma and the Jews before them, these new migrant communities may maintain their own cultural identities, identities that differ and sometimes clash with those of native Europeans, is declared to be “racist”. I would argue that the really racist idea is that non-European people are incapable of passing their cultural traits onto their children when those children are born in Europe and will inevitably adopt the culture of Europeans.

It would be more intellectually honest, if these attempts at “debunking” the great replacement would just be straightforward and would argue: “Your ethnic group will become an ethnic minority in the country your people have called home since they began to think of themselves as a separate ethnic group. This is however not a problem nor a bad thing, because of reasons X, Y and Z.”

Instead, these people insist on pretending to be outraged by the very fact that you manage to observe the demographic transformation that is unfolding during your own lifetime with the active assistance of your government and insist on calling you a racist far-right conspiracy theorist for doing so.

The final point I need to emphasize, is the absurdity of arguing that what is happening is not for all practical purposes intentional government policy. Are we supposed to believe that “oops, English people became a minority in London” and somehow the government officials could not anticipate this happening? They literally couldn’t just look through the window of their office? Has the Dutch government “accidentally” spent decades offering social housing to refugees, ahead of native Dutch seeking social housing? No, that’s a consequence of rules, policies and regulations people chose to implement, uphold and maintain.

You could argue that the intent is not to make Europeans a minority in their own country (demographic replacement), just the outcome, but that is a semantic discussion. It is at bare minimum, just a consequence you accept, of the actions you took. If you declare a war on a neighboring country, your intention might not be to watch your own soldiers die, it is just an outcome that you accept as a price worth paying. For anyone to then say that it’s an outrageous conspiracy theory for people to suggest that you actively chose the death of your soldiers, is a rhetorical trick at best. You collectively knew what the outcome would be (dead soldiers) and you collectively made a series of decisions that resulted in that outcome, even though you could have collectively chosen otherwise.

The more important point.

But I think the more important point to understand for people upset about the “great replacement”, is that there is no glorious future being stolen from you. Your white race is now for all practical purposes dying out, just like the Chinese, Koreans and the Japanese are and just as many other human ethnic groups did in the past. It doesn’t matter. The bigger problem is that billions of people are going to die this century, as our global carrying capacity will collapse due to climate change.

When I try to explain this to people, I manage to universally upset them. The low status white male far-right types will argue that “no, climate change is a hoax!!!”, because they have been deceived, by American fossil fuel interests that set up an intentional and very successful disinformation campaign decades ago. Look, if you don’t believe me, I’ll simply ask you, take a good look at the evidence I pointed out yesterday. Nobody manages to poke a hole in it. I asked Claude, Claude can’t poke a hole in it either.

The leftist academic pronoun types seem to be upset because it means there is no great revenge on those evil white people for colonialism and imperialism. The centrist neoliberal types really don’t want to hear the simple fact that we’re not in control and the future is going to suck. Nobody likes to hear what I have to say.

If I say to right wing types, “the great replacement is real and it’s basically inevitable, don’t spend your time worrying about it”, the people who seem really upset are the leftist academic types and the centrist neoliberal types: “How dare you give those right-wing low status white males some peace?!? They’re supposed to be angry and shouting, while I get to stick my fingers in my ears and delightfully shout: ‘LALALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU, ALSO YOU’RE RACIST AND IT’S NOT HAPPENING!'”

My honest question is: Why would you want your white children to grow up in the hellish future that we now inevitably face? I don’t understand most of these far right low status white male types at all. The best thing anyone can do at this point, white, brown, yellow, black, whatever color your skin may have, is to avoid reproducing. Don’t cause more misery for future generations of people.

Why would you want your white children to be the only white children in their class? Why would you want your white children to live through the extinction of the orangutans and the annihilation of the Amazon forest? Why would you want your white children to live through the upcoming blackouts, or the inevitable shortage of fresh drinking water? Why would you want your white children to grow up in a world where chocolate disappears, where coffee disappears, where hundreds of millions of people worldwide will have to flee their homeland?

Why would you want your white children to grow up in a world where they can’t go skiing in the alps? Why would you want your white children to grow up in a world where food will inevitably have to be rationed? Why would you want your white children to grow up in a world where it will inevitably be prohibited to go on vacation by airplane? Why would you want your white children to grow up in a world that will inevitably be worse than the one that YOU grew up in?

You know what’s funny? I’m laughing. Why am I laughing? Because I know what’s going to happen. Within the next 25 years, all those smug academic types high on their own moral superiority who think they’re “debunking a far-right conspiracy theory”, all those neoliberal centrist types arguing “migration is an engine for growth”, all those people who feel so morally superior to the angry right-wing low status white male types, will be singing a very different tune.

Yeah of course you love the Ethiopians, because you are a very sophisticated “foodie” and there are just enough of them in your city for an Ethiopian restaurant. Now try having a million of them, roaming homeless through your country. Of course you say “refugees welcome”. Now try having forty times as many coming into your country, 25 years from now. I guarantee that long before then, you too will be singing a very uneducated, very far-right, very xenophobic, very populist tune!

I genuinely love it. I for one will be singing and tapdancing to my grave, as I look at how you witness your multicultural utopia go up in flames across Europe. You shoved this down the throats of people who did not want it, people who did not ask for it, people who have suffered through the consequences. Every major English city has a Pakistani grooming gang that sexually abused children. Guess what? Within the next 25 years, there will be nowhere to flee to. There will be no gated communities for the elite. We will all be living in Rotherham together.

You know what the funniest thing is? I know who the people are who stand the most to lose and I know they’re going to lose it, that is something I can guarantee to you. It’s not the people in Rotherham. No, it’s the people who deserve to lose it all, because they are hypocrites.

Find me one smug leftist who is not a hypocrite. They’re all hypocrites and so they all deserve to perish as a result of the contradiction between what they say and what they do. This is what I like about orthodox Muslims: The people they hate more than the unbelievers, are the hypocrites.

Let me show you what a hypocrite is. This is the Dutch prime minister, Rob Jetten. Minister of Climate between 2022 and 2024. Here you have a short overview of all the places he flew to. This guy has been everywhere, he flew all across the world. He’s a hypocrite. We have no way to get that CO2 back out of the air. He is not just a hypocrite, he openly displays the wrong example to the whole Dutch nation. What does he deserve? He deserves to experience the consequences of his hypocrisy.

Frankly, if you want something to worry about in the greater scheme of things, worry about the elephants going extinct. It took sixty million years for elephants to evolve, they could all go extinct before the end of this century. There are just half a million elephants left right now. If the elephants were to go extinct, this planet would never get them back. Same for orangutans, rhino’s and many other species.

White people on the other hand, took about 10,000 years to evolve. Just 7,000 years ago, Europeans still had dark skin according to recent research. If the climate somehow were to stabilize again thousands of years in the future and humans manage to avoid going extinct in the meantime, white people can just re-evolve from other groups of people, it would not take more than a few thousand years for such a thing to happen at most.

Human diversity is valuable of course, but there is a much bigger genetic split between the Khoisan and non-Khoisan people of our species, we genetically split from each other an estimated 100,000 to 150,000 years ago. If the Khoisan were to go extinct, which is actually far more likely than it is for white people to go extinct because of their smaller population, that would be a much bigger loss to overall human diversity.

Overall, humans of all ethnic and racial backgrounds should try to focus on cooperating to make sure that the non-human species stand a chance to survive the currently unfolding catastrophe. I like white people, I understand that they feel upset by mass immigration, but my recommendation to them is: Don’t reproduce, accept that the white race will die out during the coming decades, just like the Japanese and Korean people are. Focus on trying to help non-white people, especially people in Africa, save the endangered non-human species.

But above all else: Enjoy the fireworks show that is about to start, as the hypocrites start to see the consequences of their actions and decisions blow up in their own faces. It is simply a matter of time, before they too will be living in Rotherham.