Yes, the vaccines are gene therapy

If you look around on the Internet, you’ll find that anyone who suggests these vaccines are a form of gene therapy is immediately censored. The fact-checkers, our timeline’s equivalent of bureaucrats of the Ministry of Truth, are also eager to debunk the assertion that the vaccines are a form of gene therapy. And so when you look it up, you’ll immediately find yourself exposed to a massive lie of omission. Because what do they tell you?

-The Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines are not a form of gene therapy.

That’s the lie of omission right there. You can argue about whether Moderna and Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines should be considered gene therapy, as the mRNA should be transiently expressed. But what are we missing here? We’re missing two of the four vaccines that we are receiving in the Western world. You can argue that the mRNA vaccines are not a form of gene therapy because the mRNA is probably not permanently integrated into your genome. However, billions of people around the world have now received a dose of two other vaccines manufactured by Janssen and Astrazeneca.

Notice how the fact-checkers NEVER mention the Adenovirus vector vaccines when they try to debunk the “gene therapy” claim. They don’t mention it, because these vaccines are designed as gene therapy. There’s not a word mentioned about these Adenovirus vector vaccines in the article I linked to above. It is an admission by omission.

The whole point of using an Adenovirus vector is to cause permanent genetic alterations to your body. And if we’re doing that to someone who has an otherwise deadly metabolic disease due to a genetic mutation, you won’t hear me complain. But they have given these vaccines to hundreds of millions of young healthy people worldwide.

We have now seen 2.5 billion doses of the Astrazeneca vaccine distributed worldwide. In addition to this, there are hundreds of millions of people, who have received the Janssen vaccine. In Russia, millions of people are receiving the Sputnik vaccine, which also uses an Adenovirus vector.

What do these vaccines have in common? They are replication defective Adenovirus vector vaccines. An Adenovirus is a DNA virus that will enter your cells, to deliver DNA that the cell will then go on to express. The Adeno viruses that they use in these vaccines are missing certain genes, which should generally prohibit them from going on to make new copies of themselves that can infect more cells. However, they succeed in initially entering your cells and delivering the genetic payload.

What these vaccines are designed to do is to deliver DNA that produces copies of the Spike protein into your cells. Whereas mRNA expression should be temporary, these Adenovirus vector vaccines are designed to permanently make your body express the DNA deliver to your cells.

Take a look at this study:

Adenoviral vectors persist in vivo and maintain activated CD8+ T cells: implications for their use as vaccines

CD8+ T cell-numbers rapidly expand and then contract after exposure to their cognate antigen. Here we show that the sustained frequencies of transgene product-specific CD8+ T cells elicited by replication-defective adenovirus vectors are linked to persistence of low levels of transcriptionally active adenovirus vector genomes at the site of inoculation, in liver, and lymphatic tissues. Continuously produced small amounts of antigen maintain fully active effector CD8+ T cells, while also allowing for their differentiation into central memory cells. The long-term persistence of adenoviral vectors may be highly advantageous for their use as vaccines against pathogens for which T-cell–mediated protection requires both fully activated T cells for immediate control of virus-infected cells and central memory CD8+ T cells that, because of their higher proliferative capacity, may be suited best to eliminate cells infected by pathogens that escaped the initial wave of effector T cells.


Further down we read:

To formally demonstrate whether the E1-deleted Ad vector genome persists, tissues of mice were tested for presence of vector sequences 4, 30, 90, and 360 days after intramuscular immunization with an AdC68 vector by a nested real-time PCR (Figure 2A).19  Vector sequences could not be detected from most tissues such as ovaries, muscle distant from the inoculation site, lung, heart, brain, stomach, nasal associated lymphoid tissue, or trachea (not shown). Four days after vaccination with an AdC68 vector, transgene sequences could be detected in liver, spleen, and the inoculated muscle. By days 30 and 90, vector sequences remained detectable in most animals in these tissues but gradually declined 102 to 103-fold. After 1 year, relative copy numbers in liver and the injected muscles were comparable with those seen on day 90, whereas a further decline was seen in spleens. 

These Adenovirus vectors are designed to make your own tissues express the DNA forever. The only reason the expression declines over time, is because your own immune system will seek out these cells to destroy them. If you received one of the Adenovirus vector vaccines, there is a continual effort ongoing in your body by your immune system to get rid of all the cells that were reprogrammed to produce the toxic spike protein. However, it seems that your body is unable to get rid of these cells from the muscle and the liver.

Besides the simple fact that you don’t want your immune system to attack your own tissues, the spike protein is toxic. Your own body is now chronically producing this toxic protein that is released into the bloodstream. The spike protein damages your hematopoietic stem cells. These stem cells are responsible for producing your white blood cells.

If you have received one of the Adenovirus vector vaccines then it means you have been injected with a genetically manipulated virus, that is intended to introduce foreign genetic material into your cells that persists for as long as the cells themselves survive. This genetic material produces a toxic protein that is capable of damaging the stem cells that are responsible for producing your white blood cells.

This is what these vaccines are designed to do. The whole technique they’re using is meant to get your body to continually produce small amounts of this toxic protein, so that your immune system will continually mount a sustained immune response against this toxic protein. That’s why they only have to give you one dose, whereas with the mRNA vaccines they give you two doses.

They can’t even give you two doses of the Adenovirus vector vaccines, because it won’t even properly work anymore. Your immune system is immediately on high alert for the Adenovirus material and will do whatever it can to prevent these viruses from entering your cells again. It only works the first time, because your immune system is not yet prepared for what they’re doing. Notice how all the boosters people are given are based on mRNA. Nobody who received an Adenovirus vector vaccine receives a booster based on an Adenovirus vector vaccine.

And if you weren’t aware yet, the Spike protein of the actual virus changes over time. But right now, your own cells are still producing a version of the Spike protein that is completely different from the version found in Omicron. Your immune system is being prepared to defend against a version of the Spike protein that no longer exists, because your own cells were reprogrammed to produce a version of the Spike protein that no longer exists.

And worth noting too is that they don’t just make your cells produce the regular plain Wuhan spike protein. They introduced changes into the genome, to produce a version of the Spike protein that is stabilized in the conformation that allows it to bind to the ACE2 receptor. Affinity of this stabilized version of the Spike protein to the ACE2 receptor appears to be higher than that of the natural spike protein.

Your T cells are now continually forced to attack any of the cells they encounter that express this spike protein. Persistent infections are known to lead to T cell exhaustion, these adenovirus vector vaccines may very well cause the same issue in some people, we just don’t know right now. It’s not normal for a vaccine to produce an immune response that declines this dramatically within a few months. Keep in mind, the reason the vaccines cease to work is not just because the virus itself changes, there is also some issue related to the immune response itself rapidly declining. Why does the immune response decline so rapidly? We don’t know.

Gene therapy is difficult and full of risks. Gene therapies with retroviruses caused leukemia. Gene therapies with adenoviruses were thought to be pretty safe initially, but now it’s clear that these also cause changes that lead to cancer. In mice, the adenovirus gene therapies have been known to lead to liver cancer. The adenovirus DNA causes changes that encourages the cells to divide themselves. In human children, we encounter adenovirus DNA in most brain tumors.

Nobody can tell you whether these Adenovirus vector vaccines are going to be causing cancer years down the line. It’s a risk that is impossible to quantify, but it’s an experiment that has now been carried out with hundreds of millions of young people around the world. Hundreds of millions of people have been subjected to gene therapy, not to cure a disease, but in an effort to protect them against a virus that might infect them, only for the attempt to protect them against the virus to fail.

This is the most reckless experiment in human history.


  1. Wow. This was a terrifying read. I had absolutely no idea.
    I have avoided the genocide jabs so far but I had initially been under the impression that the Astrazeneca (or the “Oxford vaccine” as the media called it in the UK to make it sound more homely) was the lesser of two evils and more “traditional”. I was clearly wrong.
    Nobody mentions Astrazeneca in the UK any more – the “safe and effective” vaccine has been well and truly memory-holed. There was a fairly high profile case of a young, healthy BBC radio presenter and mother of two who was killed by it.
    The more I learn about these “jabs” (as British politicians love to call them) the more I am filled with rage at the authorities that have pushed these into people. And utter contempt for those who continue to shill for them.

    • Yes, it is two doses. I’m in Australia and most older people received the AZ vax which was a two dose one. However, I believe that in Australia they are boosting with Moderna or Pfizer.

  2. We will need even more shots it seems. Everyone needs to be dependent on big pharma and governments for the rest of their lives.

    “In principle, future treatments that reverse those epigenetic changes could turn exhausted T cells in patients into normal memory T cells again. Epigenetic drugs have long been a hope of cancer therapy because tumor cells also undergo epigenetic dysregulation. These drugs, however, remain somewhat unwieldly or imprecise in their effects. However, if the right epigenetic drugs can be found to modulate immune cells that could help patients fight ongoing cancers or viral infections, and could also provide patients with stronger long-term immunity following the eradication of tumors or chronic viral infections. Studies at Penn Medicine are ongoing to manipulate the epigenetics of exhausted T cells in combination with immunotherapy.”

  3. Correct. As a one-time experiment, the only silver lining is that this category of vaccines won’t be rolled out again anytime soon in the West. However, I was deeply angered at the propaganda bait-and-switch thoroughly seeded via the media of “the mRNA vaccines may be a new technology, but if you’re hesitant about them you can get the AZ/J&J/Sputnik which is (allegedly) a traditional form of vaccine”. The hell it is.

    (And this is also a reason Russia’s vaccination program is just as evil as the West, and possibly even more so. The western countries aren’t boosting with AZ, but in addition to ubiquitous QR code tyranny, the Russian government is happy to scare its senior citizens in revaccinating with another double-dose round of adenovirus Sputnik vaxx. When Sputnik came out the supposed uber genious point trumpeted everywhere was that it used two adenovirus variants in case the vaccinee already had immunity to one of them. That marketing point’s been completely memory-holed to enable the Sputnik Lite [because adenovirus #2 turned out much harder to manufacture] and Sputnik booster campaigns.)

    Unlike mRNA vaccines (which were pushed into prime time from sci-fi dreams meeting panicked Biotech investors afraid they’ve funded another Theranos), there *is* some real-world experience using adenovirus vaccines against coronaviruses when farming cattle. (This experience is probably the reason COVID vaccination was taken over by a land rush of veterinarians who are puzzled and dismayed that their new human cattle have free will and are somehow able to refuse vaccination and procure alternative treatments.) There are two important caveats to this veterinary experience. First, it was long understood that the immunity granted against coronavirus is temporary, and vaccination is carefully timed to when the cows are unusually vulnerable e.g. when crowded together for transport. Secondly, the inevitable Step 5 of the cow health care program involves turning the cow into McDonald’s hamburgers, so I’m afraid the question of whether the cow would otherwise reach a happy old age without cancer is probably under-studied.

  4. LINE-1 elements and other retrotransposons in all human cells have already been show regularly and measurably retro transposing the RNA from Covid itself back into active coding sections of cellular DNA. The shorter “optimised” RNA in the mRNA vaccines should be expected to be being written back by such mechanisms even MORE often, and that’s assuming they didnt sneak some RNA coding for transposase into the vaccines, which is something that was rumoured and something most would have no ability to test for.

    Both the mRNA and Adenovirus vector “vaccines” are gene therapies that alter nuclear DNA, the only questions are how significantly, to what effect, and how long it takes for the immune system to remove these GMO’d cells, if ever.

  5. Thanks for all your posts – I haven’t commented before but felt I could add to this particular discussion today as you don’t seem to have mentioned Stefan Oelrich? He is the president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division and told international “experts” during a globalist health conference that the mRNA COVID-19 shots are indeed “cell and gene therapy” marketed as “vaccines” to be palatable to the public.

    “We are really taking that leap [to drive innovation] – us as a company, Bayer – in cell and gene therapies … ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate,” stated Oelrich.

    Video version here:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.